Background Image
Previous Page  62 / 105 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 105 Next Page
Page Background

E

l

-F

akhouri

S

et

al

.

252

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(3):248-254

We know that the adult intensive care units occupy an

important place in hospitals, with an increase in demand

and occupancy in recent decades. Secondary and tertia-

ry care hospitals typically have a high occupancy rate; in

our study, the average occupancy rate was 94%. Likewise,

Kimura,

28

showed a monthly occupancy rate in ICUs in

the municipality of São Paulo between 80 and 100% in

58% of the units assessed.

Fluctuations in the average number of days of ICU

hospitalization may have several explanations and gener-

ally reflect peculiarities of the population profile in each

hospital and in each intensive care unit. Several studies

show a variable average stay from 4.09 to 28.8 days,

13,15,19,24,28-

30

which places us in a comfortable position with the av-

erage of 8.09 days. We can assume that the possible causes

of these large variations in mean hospital stay are related

to the age and preexisting comorbidities in individuals of

the studies in question, including ours. Also quoted the

respiratory diseases that, in most cases, when they need

intensive care, take a longer length of stay for the proba-

ble reason for the use of mechanical ventilation as one of

the main challenges in treatment and ICUs. The same with

Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, predominantly repre-

sented in our hospital by Sepsis, responsible for large in-

vestments and longer intensive care.

One less desirable aspect found in our study is the

overall mortality rate. Nevertheless, to compare mortal-

ity among the ICUs, we must consider the number of

available beds, which differs in all of the studies thus

limiting the relevance of this comparison. During the

study period, we had 24.32% mortality; unfortunately,

this is a higher rate compared to results found in major

Brazilian cities – Unicamp

31

(13.46%) or in more devel-

oped countries, such as Scandinavia

32

(9.1%), Australia

and New Zealand

33

(16.1%). But we do have a lower mor-

tality rate compared to Uganda Africans

34

(40.1%). One

possible explanation for our mortality rate seems to be

that we receive patients with low levels of education and

economic power, which reflects in more severe cases. We

also serve a large region (DRS IX), including 62 munic-

ipalities, and just over half of the patients (53.81%) are

from the city of Marília. This leads us to assume that we

may be receiving in our ICU cases referred from other

cities at later, more complex stages, with worse and un-

desirable outcomes. Moreover, the hospital’s economic

situation, which depends solely on government funding,

is unfavorable. More resources could yield better success

rates regarding the treatment of critically ill patients

and improvement in mortality rates.

C

onclusion

Since the end of last century, the intensive care units have

become crucial in hospitals to treat increasingly severe

and senile populations. Our ICU, at Hospital das Clíni-

cas de Marília (Famema), has presented an epidemiolog-

ical profile similar to other units in Brazil and worldwide,

despite the few studies found in the literature. Our study

showed that study population has the following predom-

inant profile: Male, elderly, low education, Catholics and

white. Diseases of the Circulatory System were the lead-

ing cause of ICU admissions and death, and the age range

from 70 to 79 years had the highest mortality.

TABLE 3

 Distribution of the number of deaths in ICU

vs.

ICD-10

vs

. age range.

ICD-10 group

N

o

of deaths per age range (years)

Total

<15 15 a 29 30 a 49 50 a 59 60 a 69 70 a 79 ≥ 80 n %

I00-I99 Diseases of the circulatory system

3

22

27

37

35

22 146 30.99

A00-B99 Infectious and parasitic diseases

8

27

26

13

25

8

107 22.71

S00-T98 Injury, poisoning, and other external causes 2 10

21

11

9

8

7

68 14.43

K00-K93 Diseases of gastrointestinal apparatus

_

_

3

11

16

12

11 53 11.25

J00-J99 Diseases of the respiratory system

_

2

6

4

15

12

8

47 9.97

C00-D48 Neoplasms

_

1

6

2

5

5

4

23 4.88

N00-N99 Diseases of the genitourinary system _

_

1

2

1

_

1

5 1.06

E00-E90 Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases _

_

1

1

1

1

_

4 0.84

G00-G99 Diseases of the nervous system

_

_

1

1

_

_

_

2 0.42

Other

_

_

3

5

2

4

2

16 3.39

Total

2 24

91

90

99

102 63 471 100

(%)

0.42 5.09 19.32 19.10 21.01 21.65 13.37

n (absolute number of admissions); % (percentage)