Background Image
Previous Page  64 / 83 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 64 / 83 Next Page
Page Background

S

adalla

JC

et

al

.

542

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2015; 61(6):536-542

28. Roque DR, WyshamWZ, Soper JT. The surgical management of cervical cancer:

an overview and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014; 69(7):426-41.

29.

Pareja R, Rendón GJ, Vasquez M, Echeverri L, Sanz-Lomana CM, Ramirez

PT. Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy

followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer

with tumors 2 cm or larger: A literature review and analysis of oncological

and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 137(3):574-80. 30.

30.

Buekers TE, Anderson B, Sorosky JI, Buller RE. Ovarian function after

surgical treatment for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 80(1):85-8.

31.

Dursun P, Ayhan A, Yanik FB, Ku

ş

çu E. Ovarian transposition for the

preservation of ovarian function in young patients with cervical carcinoma.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009; 30(1):13-5.

32.

Rasool N, Rose PG. Fertility-preserving surgical procedures for patients

with gynecologic malignancies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53(4):804-14.

33. Chhabra S, Kutchi I. Fertility preservation in gynecological cancers. Clin

Med Insights Reprod Health. 2013; 7:49-59.

34.

Lécuru F, Mathevet P, Querleu D, Leblanc E, Morice P, Daraï E et al. Bilateral

negative sentinel nodes accurately predict absence of lymph node metastasis

in early cervical cancer: results of the SENTICOL study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;

29(13):1686-91.

35.

Bats AS, Mathevet P, Buenerd A, Orliaguet I, Mery E, Zerdoud S et al. The

sentinel node technique detects unexpected drainage pathways and allows

nodal ultrastaging in early cervical cancer: insights from the multicenter

prospective SENTICOL study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(2):413-22.

36.

Kadkhodayan S, Hasanzadeh M, Treglia G, Azad A, Yousefi Z, Zarifmahmoudi

L et al. Sentinel node biopsy for lymph nodal staging of uterine cervix cancer:

a systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature. Eur J Surg

Oncol. 2015; 41(1):1-20.

37. Tax C, Rovers MM, de Graaf C, Zusterzeel PL, Bekkers RL. The sentinel node

procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic

review. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;pii:S0090-8258(15)30137-2.

38.

Banerjee R, Kamrava M. Brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer:

a review. Int J Womens Health. 2014; 6:555-64.

39. Tanderup K, Viswanathan AN, Kirisits C, Frank SJ. Magnetic resonance

image guided brachytherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014; 24(3):181-91.

40. Vargo JA, Beriwal S. Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. World

J Clin Oncol. 2014; 5(5):921-30.

41.

Dutta S, Nguyen NP, Vock J, Kerr C, Godinez J, Bose S et al. Image-guided

radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Front Oncol. 2015;

5:64.

42.

Harkenrider MM, Alite F, Silva SR, Small W Jr. Image-based brachytherapy

for the treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;

92(4):921-34.

43.

Leath CA, Straughn JM Jr. Chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent cervical

carcinoma: results from cooperative group trials. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;

129(1):251-7.

44.

Pfaendler KS, Tewari KS. Changing paradigms in the systemic treatment of

advanced cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; pii:S0002-9378(15)00772-3.

45. Tomao F, Papa A, Rossi L, Zaccarelli E, Caruso D, Zoratto F et al. Angiogenesis

and antiangiogenic agents in cervical cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2014;

7:2237-48.

46.

Jackson MW, Rusthoven CG, Fisher CM, Schefter TE. Clinical potential of

bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic and locally advanced cervical

cancer: current evidence. Onco Targets Ther. 2014; 7:751-9.

47.

Petit R, Basu P. ADXS11-001 immunotherapy targeting HPV-E7: preliminary

survival data from a phase II study in Indian women with recurrent/refractory

cervical cancer [abstract]. Presented at 2012 American Society of Clinical

Oncology Annual Meeting; June 1-5, 2012; Chicago, IL.

48. Delpech Y, Tulpin L, Bricou A, Barranger E. Lymph node surgical staging for

locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010; 38(1):30-5.

49.

Uzan C, Gouy S, Pautier P, Haie-Meder C, Duvillard P, Narducci F et al. Para-

aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage cervical cancer: standard

procedure in 2010?. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010; 38(11):668-71.

50.

Uzan C, Souadka A, Gouy S, Debaere T, Duclos J, Lumbroso J et al. Analysis

of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic

lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage

cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area.

Oncologist. 2011; 16(7):1021-7.

51.

Smits RM, Zusterzeel PL, Bekkers RL. Pretreatment retroperitoneal para-

aortic lymph node staging in advanced cervical cancer: a review. Int J Gynecol

Cancer. 2014; 24(6):973-83.

52. Chantalat E, Vidal F, Leguevaque P, Lepage B, Mathevet P, Deslandres M et

al. Cervical cancer with paraaortic involvement: do patients truly benefit

from tailored chemoradiation therapy? A retrospective study on 8 French

centers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 193:118-22.

53.

Hwang L, Bailey A, Lea J, Albuquerque K. Para-aortic nodal metastases in

cervical cancer: a blind spot in the International Federation of Gynecology

and Obstetrics staging system: current diagnosis and management. Future

Oncol. 2015; 11(2):309-22.

54.

Sardain H, Lavoue V, Redpath M, Bertheuil N, Foucher F, Levêque J. Curative

pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent

chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol.

2015; 41(8):975-85.

55. Ang C, Bryant A, Barton DP, Pomel C, Naik R. Exenterative surgery for

recurrent gynaecological malignancies (Review). Cochrane Database Syst

Rev. 2014; 2:CD010449.

56.

Musto A, Grassetto G, Marzola MC, Chondrogiannis S, Maffione AM,

Rampin L et al. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the carcinoma of the uterus:

a review of literature. Yonsei Med J. 2014; 55(6):1467-72.

57. Xiao Y, Wei J, Zhang Y, Xiong W. Positron emission tomography alone,

positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed

tomography in diagnosing recurrent cervical carcinoma: a systematic review

and meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2014; 10(2):222-31.

58.

Ding X, Feng L, Ma L. Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer: PET

versus PET/CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet.

2014; 290(4):741–7.