Previous Page  96 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 96 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

R

eis

PFF

et

al

.

1012

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(11):1012-1016

REVIEW ARTICLE

Approach to concurrent coronary and carotid artery disease:

Epidemiology, screening and treatment

P

atrícia

F

eitosa

F

rota

dos

R

eis

1

, P

edro

V

ieira

L

inhares

1

, F

ábio

G

runspun

P

itta

1

, E

duardo

G

omes

L

ima

1

*

1

Department of Atherosclerosis, Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP (InCor-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

S

ummary

Study conducted at Instituto do

Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da

Faculdade de Medicina da USP

(InCor-HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Article received:

4/13/2017

Accepted for publication:

4/15/2017

*Correspondence:

Address: Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho

Aguiar 44, 2º andar, sala 2

São Paulo, SP – Brazil

Postal code: 05403-000.

eduglima@yahoo.com.br http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.11.1012

The concomitance between coronary artery disease and carotid artery disease is

known and well documented. However, it is a fact that, despite the screening

methods for these conditions and the advances in surgical treatment, little has

been achieved in terms of reducing the risk of complications in the perioperative

period. Publications are scarce, being mostly composed of reports or case series.

There is little agreement on the best initial therapeutic approach (myocardial

versus carotid revascularization) or the best technique to be used (surgery with

or without extracorporeal circulation, hybrid treatments, etc.). The authors

performed a review of the evidence in this clinical scenario, raising pragmatic

questions that help in the therapeutic decision.

Keywords:

coronary disease, carotid artery diseases, myocardial revascularization.

I

ntroduction

Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or stroke, is a periopera-

tive complication that occurs in about 2% of myocardial

revascularization (CABG) surgeries.

1

Evidence suggests

that the main etiology is the macroembolization of ath-

erothrombotic debris derived from the aortic arch.

2

An important subgroup of risk for such complication

is that of patients with significant carotid stenosis (> 70%).

However, it has been demonstrated in some studies that

this is also a predictor of severe atherosclerotic disease in

the aortic arch.

3

Therefore, the presence of significant

carotid stenosis seems to serve more as a marker of risk

for aortic arterial disease than as a causal relationship for

CVA in the perioperative period of CABG.

4

Although carotid Doppler ultrasound (USG) screen-

ing is routinely performed for preoperative CABG as-

sessment in many institutions, the benefit of carotid

revascularization surgery (CAR) in asymptomatic pa-

tients is questioned.

5

Therapeutic choice in patients with coronary artery

disease (CAD) and concomitant carotid disease is also

controversial, based on few studies and the experience

of institutions. Therapeutic strategies include: 1. com-

bined surgery (CABG and CAR in the same procedure);

2. staged surgeries (CABG with subsequent CAR x CAR

with subsequent CABG); 3. hybrid procedure (CABG with

percutaneous carotid intervention – PCI). The strategies

can be simultaneous or staged, being performed in one

or two surgical times, respectively.

6,7

C

arotid

artery

disease

screening

in

the

preoperative

period

of

myocardial

revascularization

Currently, there is a strong tendency to request USG ca-

rotid Doppler as part of preoperative assessment of CABG.

In patients undergoing CABG, the prevalence of major

carotid disease is known to range from 2.8 to 22%. On

the other hand, among patients undergoing endarterec-

tomy, the prevalence of coronary artery disease is between

28 and 40%.

8

Despite the strong association between dis-

eases, the incidence of CVA in patients submitted to CABG

is low, varying from 1.3 to 2.0%.

5

The etiology of perioperative CVA is multifactorial, the

most common being embolism calcified plaques. Accord-

ing to a meta-analysis by Naylor and Bown,

9

the incidence

of ipsilateral CVA combined with important asymptomatic

ipsilateral carotid stenosis is low, only 2%. Note that the

main etiologies are related to the procedure per se, such as

pressure control, diastolic pulmonary hypertension, ath-

erothrombotic macroembolization during aortic clamping

and cannulation, and microembolization of platelet aggre-

gates caused by a swirling flow in cardiopulmonary bypass.

10

Risk factors for perioperative CVA are: previous CVA

or transient ischemic attacks (TIA), peripheral arterial