Previous Page  11 / 113 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 113 Next Page
Page Background

G

uidelines

for

the

treatment

of

central

nervous

system

metastases

using

radiosurgery

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(7):559-563

561

Recommendation

Radiosurgery should preferably be performed in patients

with up to four lesions and a maximum diameter of 4 cm.

3. W

hat

are

the

advantages

of

radiosurgery

compared

to whole

brain

radiotherapy

?

Radiosurgery has the advantage of offering a more con-

formed and localized treatment, with larger ablative

doses than whole brain radiotherapy.

29-32

Thus, it minimizes the deleterious effects of whole

brain radiotherapy with regard mainly to neurocognitive

deficit and declining quality of life.

22,30,32-34

(

A

)

Another important point is that radiosurgery offers

higher rates of local control, even in patients with histo-

logically radioresistant tumors (requiring higher doses of

ionizing radiation, e.g., melanoma, renal tumors, and sar-

coma) compared with whole brain radiotherapy.

35,36

(

B

)

Recommendation

Radiosurgery decreases the risk of neurocognitive decline

and can positively impact the patients’ quality of life.

4. W

hat

is

the

effectiveness

of

radiosurgery

in

the

approach

of

patients

with

brain

metastases

?

Radiosurgery alone for the treatment of brain metasta-

ses produces local control rates ranging from 65 to

94%.

15,37,38

(

B

)

The main factors related to local control after radio-

surgery are: characteristics of tumor lesion and treatment

dose. Doses lower than 14 Gy and cystic and necrotic

lesions are associated with a greater likelihood of recur-

rence.

39,40

(

B

)

The efficacy of radiosurgery does not depend on the

histological type of the primary tumor since local control

rates are similar in both radiosensitive and radioresistant

tumors.

41-43

(

B

)

Recommendation

Radiosurgery is effective for the treatment of patients

with brain metastases, even in those with histologically

radioresistant primary tumors.

5. W

hat

are

the

benefits

and

disadvantages

of

performing

two

treatment

modalities

involving

radiosurgery

and

whole

brain

radiotherapy

in patients with brain metastases

?

There have been some randomized phase 3 trials evaluat-

ing the use of radiosurgery (RS) associated with whole

brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or WBRT alone in patients

with brain metastases and limited disease (1 to 4 intra-

parenchymal lesions).

20,21

Aoyama et al. reported a 12-month CNS recurrence rate

of 46.8% for the WBRT+RS group and 76.4% for RS alone

(p<0.001), and 73 and 89% (p=0.002) of local control for

the RS and WBRT+RS groups, respectively. However, there

was no difference in overall survival between groups.

29

(

A

)

Chang et al. reported that patients treated with

WBRT+RS have a rate of learning decline and mean func-

tional memory of 52 versus 24% in the RS group. Although

brain metastasis-free survival rates at one year were higher

in the WBRT+RS (73%) than in the RS (23%) group, there

was no difference in overall survival and RS patients were

easily rescued with new therapy.

30

(

A

)

Brown et al. presented data according to which the

addition of WBRT to RS, despite improving local control

(50.5 x 84.9% at one year with RS alone and WBRT+RS,

respectively), did not lead to an increase in overall sur-

vival and was negatively correlated with some cognitive

decline, especially for memory, verbal fluency and im-

mediate memory in the WBRT+RS group (p<0.05).

44

(

A

)

In a systematic review that included the meta-analysis

of individual data from randomized clinical trials, the

authors noted that in patients aged less than 50 years, with

1 to 4 lesions and good performance, the use of RS alone

led to longer overall survival, whereas the initial omission

of WBRT did not produce any more failures in CNS.

45

(

A

)

In addition, despite worse local control rates and higher

rates of salvage treatment, RS proved in the economic

analysis to be more cost effective than WBRT+RS.

46

(

B

)

Recommendation

The addition of whole brain radiotherapy in patients

treated with radiosurgery allows greater intracranial local

control, despite no positive impact on overall survival.

The use of whole brain radiotherapy may be related to

worsening of cognition, verbal function and memory.

6. A

fter

surgical

resection

of

brain

metastases

,

is

there

a

role

for

adjuvant

radiosurgery

in

the

surgical

bed

?

In the postsurgical adjuvant scenario, one of the standard

treatment regimens is toperformwhole brain radiotherapy.

47-48

However, in order to avoid the detrimental effects of

whole brain radiotherapy, some authors advocate the use

of adjuvant radiosurgery in the surgical bed.

A phase 2 clinical study evaluated the use of radio-

surgery with a median dose of 18 Gy in patients with

performance status ≥ 70 and ≤ 2 resected brain metas-

tases. Local and regional failure rates of 22 and 44%,