Previous Page  102 / 113 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 113 Next Page
Page Background

S

teiner

ABQ

et

al

.

652

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(7):651-655

At a Key Symposiumheld in Stockholm in the year 2003,

MCI was defined as a heterogeneous entity divided into three

categories: amnestic MCI with greater risk of AD; MCI of

multiple cognitive domains; andMCI with impairment of a

single cognitive function different frommemory.

10

Main

diagnostic points of MCI were redefined: the individual be-

ing neither normal nor demented; evidence of cognitive

declinemeasured objectively or based on subjective perception

combined with objective cognitive impairment; preservation

of basic living and complex instrumental activities or mini-

mally compromised.

10

A task force of American authorities,

led by the National Institute of Aging and the Alzheimer’s

Association, proposed a review of the criteria used for the

classification of MCI in 2011.

11

Despite the basic clinical

criteria being similar to those for MCI diagnosis, this review

opened the focus on the probable etiological mechanisms

that lead to cognitive impairment, with emphasis on early

diagnosis of AD, via the utilization of biomarkers.

The term “mild cognitive disorder” was included in

the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) to be

applied to patients that presented a decline in cognitive

performance, usually accompanied by abnormalities in

objective tests for cognitive functions, but not sufficient-

ly to fulfill the diagnostic criteria of dementia.

12

E

pidemiology

The first population-based study on the prevalence of

MCI and its subtypes (Figure 1)

13

was based on a cardio-

vascular health study.

14

The researchers applied the cri-

teria for MCI retrospectively in a cohort and found a

prevalence of 22%, of which 6% referred to the amnestic

subtype and 16% to multiple domains in patients aged

65 years or older.

15

Other studies demonstrated an inci-

dence rate from 1 to 6% per year and a prevalence of 3 to

22%.

15

The prevalence and incidence of MCI found in

Brazil was similar to rates observed in other countries.

16

In a riverside-dwelling population with low education

and practically no vascular risk factors, MCI prevalence

was 7.7%.

17

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the

prevalence of dementia among individuals aged 60 years

or older found a narrow range of 5-7% in most world

regions, with a higher prevalence in Latin America (8.5%),

and a distinctively lower prevalence in the four sub-Sa-

haran African regions (2-4%).

18

In this study, 35.6 million

people lived with dementia worldwide in 2010, with num-

bers expected to almost double every 20 years, to 65.7

million in 2030 and 115.4 million in 2050. Yet, in 2010,

58% of all people with dementia lived in countries with

low or middle incomes, with this proportion expected to

rise to 63% in 2030 and 71% in 2050.

18

P

rogression

to

AD (F

igure

2)

19

Several authors observed an increased rate of progression

toward dementia in patients with MCI.

8,20-25

However, stud-

ies have not been replicated by other researchers. One ex-

planation for this fact may arise from the observation that

memory complaints appear to have little correlation with

the performance of individuals on objective cognitive tests.

26

On the other hand, longitudinal studies revealed that

elderly individuals with recent complaints of impaired

memory performed worse in memory tests than those

who had not had such a complaint in one year of follow-

-up. They suggest that memory complaints from the el-

derly must be taken even more seriously when accompa-

nied by objective signals of cognitive deterioration.

27,28

Despite some discrepancies among studies, the research-

ers agree that individuals diagnosed with MCI develop

dementia at a faster rate than the rest of the population.

E

valuation

of memory

problems

The initial evaluation must rely on careful obtainment of

patient history and of memory complaint, always compar-

ing to previous functional state of cognitive complaint,

29

establishing a chronology for the initiation of symptoms,

as well as habits and comorbidities; investigation of mood

symptoms and behavioral alterations. Questions on dietary

and sleep habits must be posed.

30,31

Detailed neurological

and general physical exammust be carried out, with thor-

ough observation of gait and verification of motor signals

(alterations of reflexes, rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor, slow-

ness).

32

The laboratory exams that must be performed to

rule out reversible dementia syndromes include:

Thyroid hormone tests to investigate underacti-

ve thyroid.

Vitamin B12 blood test to check vitamin deficiency.

Complete blood count to investigate infections.

Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine amino-

transferase (ALT) blood tests that check liver function.

Chemistry screening to check the level of electroly-

tes in the blood and to check kidney function.

Glucose test to check the level of sugar in the blood.

VDRL and HIV.

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a blood test that in-

vestigates signs of inflammation in the body.

Toxicology screening, examining blood and urine.

Antinuclear antibodies, a blood test used to diagno-

se autoimmune diseases.

Investigation of heavy metals in the blood, such as a

lead test.

33

A lumbar puncture to test for certain proteins in the

spinal fluid.