Previous Page  99 / 110 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 99 / 110 Next Page
Page Background

I

nduced

pluripotent

stem

cells

reprogramming

: E

pigenetics

and

applications

in

the

regenerative

medicine

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(2):180-189

185

TABLE 3

 Epigenetic changes using microRNAs.

Authors

Year miRNA Species Type of cell

Mechanism of action

Results

Judson et al.

54

2009 290-295 Mice

Fibroblast

Blocks p21, leading to

increased cell cycle proteins

Promotes the G1-S phase transition

(proliferation), indirectly activating

pluripotency factors

Li and He

50

2012 Let-7

Mice

Embryonic

stem cell

Reduced CyclinD/Cdk4

regulation

Blocks G1-S phase

Subramanyam et

al.; Lin et al.

55,56

2011 302-367

Mice

Fibroblast

Inhibits TGFII-

β

Promotes MET

Choi et al.

63

2011 34a and

34b/c

Mice

Fibroblast

Reduced regulation of p21

and p53

Indirectly blocks pluripotency factors

Li et al.

61

2014 135b

Mice

Fibroblast

Reduced expression of

TGF-

β

, Igfbp5, and Wisp1

Promotes MET

Zare et al.

49

2015 124-128 Humans Fibroblast

Regulate the development

of neurons

Promotes the migration, maturation

and differentiation of neurons,

maintaining adequate gene expression

and repressing unwanted genes

MET: mesenchymal-epithelial transition.

thology affects around 700,000 people in Japan, and is

the most common form of blindness in people aged over

60, causing progressive loss of the retinal pigment epi-

thelial monolayer. The transplant lasted around two hours

and, according to the researchers, the patient did not

suffer adverse effects, and there were an improvement in

the morphology of the macula and neovascularization.

66

This clinical trial was carried out by the group of Pro-

fessor Takahashi, co-author of the manuscripts that won

Professor Yamanaka the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2012.

However, in March 2015, clinical testing intended to treat

six patients was suspended due to regulatory changes in

regenerative medicine in Japan.

67

Other clinical trials are currently underway to test

the effectiveness of cellular therapy with iPSC in the treat-

ment of AMD, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injury,

diabetes and myocardial infarction.

68

Preliminary results

have not yet been presented.

Maintenance of the epigenetic factors of the iPSC

after reprogramming has also been used to understand

the molecular pathways involved in the development of

diseases, development of new drugs and personalized

medicine.

69

The first study conducted of this kind used

a model of neuropathic disease. The authors repro-

grammed fibroblasts from patients with Riley-Day syn-

drome and monitored in vitro splicing of the IKBKAP

(mutation associated with the disorder). Furthermore,

the researchers also evaluated candidate drugs for rever-

sal of the splicing. The study of iPSC gains relevance in

this case, due to the inability of accessing the tissues

affected by Riley-Day syndrome.

70

Other studies have

been developed along this line,

69

and are promising in

the context of drug development. Figure 2 summarizes

the use of iPSC.

C

onclusion

Despite the improvement recently seen in iPSC reprogram-

ming by up to 100 times, when compared to Yamanaka

factors,

44

the yield remains relatively low and high costs.

Another problem is the long period for full iPSC repro-

gramming and the high cells proliferation rates associ-

ated with a greater chance of developing cancer.

71

Takahashi

and Yamanaka suggest considering using iPSC with al-

logeneic transplantation in regenerative medicine, which

would improve the effectiveness of the treatment of certain

diseases such as spinal cord injury, which requires quick

treatment without waiting for the time taken for repro-

gramming.

11

Furthermore, there is a need for better un-

derstanding of how the reprogramming interventions

influence the epigenetic memory of the reprogrammed

cells. Despite advances in iPSC reprogramming, certain

questions have emerged: 1) Is it possible to completely

erase the somatic epigenetic memory by associating the

different treatments mentioned?; 2) Could “forced” repro-

gramming cause long-term damage, such as the develop-

ment of cancer or other diseases?; 3) Is it possible to replace

embryonic stem cells with iPSC in regenerative medicine?

In spite of the extraordinary progress achieved recently in

the use of iPSC, the deepening of ongoing studies and

realization of new studies are necessary in order to elucidate