Previous Page  48 / 103 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 103 Next Page
Page Background

A

lves

and

O

liveira

332

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(4):332-335

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Should azoospermic patients with varicocele disease undergo

surgery to recover fertility?

L

eonardo

de

S

ouza

A

lves

1

*, F

rancisco

B

atista

de

O

liveira

2

1

MD, Urologist, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCM-MG). Director of Procriar – Instituto de Urologia e Andrologia. Full Member of the Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), the American Urological

Association (AUA), and the American Confederation of Urology (CAU). Full Member of the Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

2

MD, Gynecologist, Endocrinologist, FCM-MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

S

ummary

Study conducted at Procriar –

Instituto de Urologia e Andrologia,

Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

Article received:

8/18/2016

Accepted for publication:

10/19/2016

*Correspondence:

Address: Rua da Bahia, 2.696,

sala 1.303

Belo Horizonte, MG – Brazil

Postal code: 30160-012

procriar@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.04.332

Introduction:

Varicocele disease is well-known cause of infertility in men. The

presence of spermatic varices veins create a hostile environment to spermatogenesis.

It results in reduced quality of the spermproduction and in some cases can determine

a total absence of sperm. The varicocelectomy procedure in patients with non-

obstructive azoospermia (NOA) can raise the rates of sperm in the semen analysis.

A positive rate for sperm, even if very low, may be sufficient to enable the capture

of sperm intended for in-vitro fertilization without the use of donor sperm.

Objetive:

To evaluate the raise of sperm in NOA patients with varicocele disease

who were submitted to a bilateral procedure to recovery sperm production.

Method:

We analized the sperm results of 25 NOA patients who undergone to

a bilateral varicocelectomy procedure.

Results:

From a total of 25 patients, three (12%) recovered sperm count four

months after procedure. One year after the procedure, five (20%) patients reco-

vered sperm production.

Conclusion:

Patients with varicocele disease and azoospermia, without genetic

changes or obstruction of the spermatic tract, should undergo surgical procedure

to recover sperm.

Keywords:

azoospermia, infertility, varicocele, surgery.

I

ntroduction

Should azoospermic patients with varicocele be operated?

In cases of marital male infertility evaluation, absence

of sperm on a sperm test is often a frustrating and de-

vastating result for the couple. The azoospermic “couple”

is referred to an assisted reproductive program many

times already condemned to resort to the use of a sperm

donor. However, something else can be offered to these

patients. An etiological diagnosis should be performed

and, depending on the cause, treatment options can be

offered. The diagnosis of varicocele disease in an azoos-

permic patient justifies the ressection of espermatic veins

to improve spermatogenesis.

O

bjective

To evaluate patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

(NOA) and varicocele undergoing bilateral surgical cor-

rection for recovery of sperm production.

M

ethod

In a retrospective study conducted from 2002 to 2015 at a

private urologic service, we analyzed 25 patients with com-

bined varicocele and azoospermia (the inclusion criteria).

The patients had two consecutives sperm samples showing

absence of sperm cells, collected within an interval of 3 to

5 days. The semen volume should be greater than 3 mL in

the studied group. Physical examination identified presen-

ce of vas deferens and uni or bilateral varicocele. The results

of laboratory tests of FSH, LH, total testosterone and fruc-

tose were within the normal range. All selected patients

underwent karyotyping and Y-chromosome microdeletion

analysis. All 25 patients underwent bilateral surgical repair

of varicocele. Sub-inguinal approach assisted by loupe

magnification was performed by the surgical team. They

all received the pre-surgical guidelines and signed an in-

formed consent form. Patients were discharged from the

hospital on the same day as the surgical procedure. The