C
hen
MJ
et
al
.
732
R
ev
A
ssoc
M
ed
B
ras
2017; 63(9):729-732
A retrospective study conducted from multi-institu-
tional databases also evaluated the role of radiotherapy
techniques in patient survival, demonstrating the supe-
riority of IMRT or conformal techniques compared to
the conventional technique, with 5-year survival rates of
14% for IMRT or conformal radiotherapy compared with
11% for conventional radiotherapy (p=0.0001). Another
similar study demonstrated a better overall survival in the
comparison between the IMRT or conformal radiotherapy
techniques and the conventional technique, but did not
demonstrate superiority of IMRT over conformal radio-
therapy in terms of survival.
22,23
(B)
C
onclusion
Treatment with IMRT can provide more conformality and
protect more critical structures than conformal radio-
therapy, also allowing the dose escalation within the target,
without prolonging the treatment time. It is particularly
indicated for “superior sulcus” (Pancoast tumors), para-
vertebral and paracardiac tumors and in complex clinical
situations in which conformal radiotherapy does not enable
the release of non-toxic doses to organs at risk.
24
IMRT significantly reduces the risk of worsening
quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing radia-
tion therapy.
There is less toxicity with the use of IMRT compared
with conformal radiotherapy for primary lung tumors,
particularly regarding the rates of grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis
and requiring feeding tube.
There is also longer survival with the use of IMRT or
conformal radiotherapy in relation to conventional ra-
diotherapy, but not with IMRT compared with conven-
tional radiotherapy.
C
onflict
of
interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
R
eferences
1.
Slotman BJ, van Tinteren H, Praag JO, Knegjens JL, El Sharouni SY, Hatton
M, et al. Use of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer:
a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 385(9962):36-42.
2. Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, Sause WT, Livingston RB, Komaki R, et al.
Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-
cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N Engl
J Med. 1999; 340(4):265-71.
3.
Burdett S, Rydzewska L, Tierney J, Fisher D, Parmar MK, Arriagada R, et al.;
PORT Meta-analysis Trialists Group. Postoperative radiotherapy for non-
small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; 10:CD002142.
4.
Rusch VW, Giroux DJ, Kraut MJ, Crowley J, Hazuka M, Johnson D, et al.
Induction chemoradiation and surgical resection for non-small cell lung
carcinomas of the superior sulcus: Initial results of Southwest Oncology
Group Trial 9416 (Intergroup Trial 0160). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;
121(3):472-83.
5. Aupérin A, Le Péchoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, et al.
Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally
advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(13):2181-90.
6. Almeida CE, Haddad CK, Ferrigno R. A evolução técnica da radioterapia
externa. In: Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia. Radioterapia Baseada em
Evidências. Recomendações da Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia. São
Paulo: SBRT. Cap. 2, p. 21-6.
7.
Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, et
al. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC):
an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;
76(3 Suppl):S3-9.
8.
Kong FM, Zhao J, Wang J, Finn CF. Radiation dose effect in locally advanced
non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2014; 6(4):336-47.
9.
Sundar JK, Mullapudi N, Yao H, Spivack SD, Rahman I. Lung cancer and
its association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: update on nexus
of epigenetics. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011; 17(4):279-85.
10.
Liu HH, Wang X, Dong L, Wu Q, Liao Z, Stevens CW, et al. Feasibility of
sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated
radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
2004; 58(4):1278-79.
11.
Shirvani SM, Juloori A, Allen PK, Komaki R, Liao Z, Gomez D, et al. Comparison
of 2 common radiation therapy techniques for definitive treatment of small
cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87(1):139-47.
12.
Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Gomez DR, Chang JY, Buchholz TA, Smith B. Intensity
modulated radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the United
States: predictors of use and association with toxicities. Lung Cancer. 2013;
82(2):252-9.
13. Chang JY. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, not 3 dimensional conformal,
is the preferred technique for treating locally advanced lung cancer. Semin
Radiat Oncol. 2015; 25(2):110-6.
14. Yom SS, Liao Z, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Hu CS, Wei X, et al. Initial evaluation
of treatment-related pneumonitis in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung
cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-
modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68(1):94-102.
15.
Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD Jr, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Mohan R, et al.
Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable
locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant
chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3):775-81.
16. Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B, Harms W, Bosch W, Lockett MA, et al.
Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment
for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;
45(2):323-9.
17.
Hope AJ, Lindsay PE, El Naqa I, Alaly JR, Vicic M, Bradley JD, et al. Modeling
radiation pneumonitis risk with clinical, dosimetric, and spatial parameters.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(1):112-24.
18.
Rodrigues G, Lock M, D’Souza D, Yu E, Van Dyk J. Prediction of radiation
pneumonitis by dose-volume histogram parameters in lung cancer – a
systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2004; 71(2):127-38.
19.
Bradley J, GrahamMV, Winter K, Purdy JA, Komaki R, Roa WH, et al. Toxicity
and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using
three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-
small-cell lung carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61(2):318-28.
20.
Rose J, Rodrigues G, Yaremko B, Lock M, D’Souza D. Systematic review of
dose-volume parameters in the prediction of esophagitis in thoracic
radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 91(3):282-7.
21.
Movsas B, Hu C, Sloan J, Bradley J, Kavadi VS, Narayan S, et al. Quality of
Life (QOL) analysis of the Randomized Radiation (RT) dose-escalation
NSCLC Trial (RTOG 0617): the rest of the story. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol
Phys. 2013; 87(2):suppl, S1-2.
22.
Sher DJ, Koshy M, Liptay MJ, Fidler MJ. Influence of conformal radiotherapy
technique on survival after chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III
non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2014;
120(13):2060-8.
23.
Harris JP, Murphy JD, Hanlon AL, Le QT, Loo BW Jr, Diehn M. A population-
based comparative effectiveness study of radiation therapy techniques in
stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;
88(4):872-84.
24. Ayadi M, Zahra N, Thariat J, Bouilhol G, Boissard P, Van Houtte P, Claude
L, Mornex F. Radiothérapie conformationelle avec modulation d’intensité
dans les carcinomes bronchiques non à petites cellules. Cancer Radiotherapie.
2014; 18(5-6):406-13.