Previous Page  21 / 111 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 111 Next Page
Page Background

L

ate

-

onset

hypogonadism

or

ADAM:

treatment

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2014; 60(5):404-414

409

Recommendation

There is strong evidence that testosterone replacement

improves the parameters of metabolic syndrome, espe-

cially if serum levels are maintained within normal limits.

We recommend maintaining serum testosterone levels

within a normal range to aid in the treatment of metabo-

lic syndrome.

H

ow

should

ART

be

administered

orally

?

Oral testosterone formulations have been developed to

replace injectable forms; however, some disadvantages

have been noted, such as variable absorption, low bioa-

vailability due to liver metabolism and the need for 2 to

3 daily doses (

D

).

41

Moreover, 17

a

-alkylated derivatives

are hepatotoxic (

A

)

1

(

D

)

41

and have already been withdrawn

from the American market (

A

).

19

Oral testosterone unde-

canoate (OTU), the only available oral formulation, is

preferably absorbed in chylomicrons, avoiding the pri-

mary hepatic passag (

D

)

41

and significantly reducing he-

patotoxicity (

A

).

17

Although most of the studies were fla-

wed due to the small number of participants or the

variability of the dose used, the effectiveness of oral ART

is questionable. Several authors have shown that the OTU,

even at appropriate doses (160 mg/day) was not effecti-

ve in improving sexual function, wellbeing, sleep distur-

bances, cognitive function, mood and quality of life in

men with ADAM(

A

).

17,19,20

The manufacturer’s recom-

mendation is for OTU to be taken during meals, yet the-

re is variability in absorption depending on the compo-

sition of the patient’s diet (

A

).

19

DHEA has been proposed as an alternative oral ART,

but the results are controversial. Morales et al.

19

demons-

trated that the ingestion of 50 mg of DHEA orally twi-

ce a day, although leading to satisfactory serum levels

did not improve the sexual function of men with ADAM

(

A

).

19

On the other hand, replacement with lower doses

of DHEA (75 mg/day) improved insulin resistance in the

individuals treated (

B

).

42

Another way to release testosterone orally is oral mu-

cosa patches which contain 30 mg of testosterone that

should be administered twice daily. In general, studies

show that this form of ART is capable of maintaining

physiological levels of serum testosterone, is safe and well

tolerated, and is an interesting option for ART in hypo-

gonadal men (

D

)

41

(

B

).

43,44

The underreported sublingual form of testostero-

ne administration should be used at a dose of 2.5 mg or

5 mg, 3 times a day. It is rapidly absorbed and metaboli-

zed, and it does not lead to a sustained increase in serum

levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and estradiol (

D

).

41

Recommendation

Oral testosterone undecanoate does not present hepato-

toxicity; however, it has proved ineffective in maintaining

adequate serum testosterone levels, and has variable ab-

sorption between individuals. It is strongly recommen-

ded NOT to use oral formulations of testosterone and

other androgens as an alternative to TRT.

H

ow

should

ART

be

administered

transdermally

?

Transdermal administration of ART includes patches,

cutaneous gels and cutaneous solutions.

The patches may be non-scrotal or scrotal, which are

thinner and have more effective testosterone absorption

than the non-scrotal version. The first presentation of

transdermal testosterone was the scrotal patch with re-

lease of 4 or 6 mg testosterone/day. It should be applied

once daily on depilated scrotal skin (

D

).

41

The most com-

monly used patches are non-scrotal, releasing 5 mg/day

of testosterone and should be applied once a day on clean

and dry glabrous skin (

B

).

43

Due to the large number of patches on the interna-

tional market from different manufacturers, in the opi-

nions of the authors, the tolerability of patients is quite

variable due to local adverse effects. They are considered

large and uncomfortable to use, and some formulations

cause local reactions and exhibit low adhesion that ends

up causing low acceptability by patients (

B

).

43

There are

reports of patients who have discontinued treatment due

to allergic reactions at the application site, even when

using a local corticosteroid ointment (

B

).

44

On the other hand, the authors are unanimous re-

garding the efficacy and safety of this type of ART. The

transdermal patches available provide physiological and

constant levels of serum testosterone, and mimic the cir-

cadian rhythm. At a dose of 5 to 7.5 mg/day, changing

patches every 48 hours, they are capable of producing a

significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life

of patients with ADAM(

A

)

8

(

B

).

45-47

With respect to secu-

rity, Raynaud et al.

44,47

reported that the use of transder-

mal patches showed no negative impact on the hematocrit

and lipid profile of patients (

B

),

45

and does not contami-

nate other people or the environment (

B

).

47

Many patients prefer transdermal gels or solutions as

they are easy to apply, substantially free of local reactions

and do not require injections (

D

).

41

Testosterone gel for-

mulations available on the health market are available in

the concentration of 1% as “pumps”, so that each “puff ”

releases 1.25 g of product; individual 2.5 g and 5 g pac-

kages or single dose tubes containing 5 g of the product.