Previous Page  15 / 111 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 111 Next Page
Page Background

D

egenerative

spondylolisthesis

:

surgical

treatment

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2014; 60(5):400-403

403

26.

Haka J, Wroñski J. The role of reduction in operative treatment of

spondylolytic spondylolisthesis Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska 2008;

42, 4: 345–352.

27.

Matthiass HH, Heine J. The surgical reduction of spondylolisthesis.

Clin

Orthop

1986; 203: 34-44.

28.

Umeta RS, Avanzi O. Techniques of lumbar-sacral spine fusion in spondylosis:

systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):668-76. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

29.

Han X, Zhu Y, Cui C, Wu YA. Meta-analysis of circumferential fusion

versus

instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. Spine. 2009 Aug

1;34(17):E618-25.

30. Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Fan SW. Meta-analysis of instrumented

posterior interbody fusion

versus

instrumented posterolateral fusion in the

lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Sep;15(3):295-310. Epub 2011May 27.

21.

Corinthian Diagnostic Radiology, New York, NY, USA.

Lumbar spinal

stenosis assessment with computed tomography, magnetic resonance

imaging, and myelography.ClinOrthopRelat Res.

2001 Mar;(384):122-

36.

22. Ohomori K. Clinical application of a novel assessment for lumbosacral

stability J Neurosurg 2009 JUn 10(¨6) 587-594.

23. Gunzburg R, Szpalski M. Use of a novel beta-tricalciumphosphate-

basedbonevoidfiller as a graftextender in spinal fusion surgeries. Orthopedics.

2002;25(5):591.

24.

Dai LY, Jiang LS. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of lumbar

spine with beta-tricalcium phosphate

versus

autograft: a prospective,

randomized study with 3-year follow up. Spine. 2008;33:1299-304.

25.

Setti SR,Raju B. Reduction of spondylolisthesis Neurosurg Focus 13 (1):2,

2002.