Background Image
Previous Page  92 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 92 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

L

eite

JF

et

al

.

186

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(2):184-187

The patient was advised to continue the outpatient

follow-up where she remained in weekly monitoring, pro-

gressing with falling

β

-hCG levels. After 58 days of mon-

itoring, the

β

-hCG value was negative, as displayed in the

graph of the progression of this examination (Figure 2).

After 3 months of treatment with methotrexate, another

transvaginal ultrasound was conducted, showing the dis-

appearance of the gestational sac (Figure 3).

D

iscussion

Cesarean scar pregnancy is the rarest form of ectopic preg-

nancy. Since the first case described in 1978 until 2001,

there were only 19 cases reported. By 2006 there were 155

cases and by 2011 the number of cases described in the

literature was 751, showing a rapid increase in the inci-

dence of this type of pregnancy.

1, 8-11

The basis of the pathophysiology is the invasion of

the blastocyst in the myometrium through minimal com-

munication between the previous cesarean scar and the

endometrial cavity.

12

The cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy tends to have a

more aggressive behavior because of the risk of uterine

rupture and bleeding in the first and second trimesters

of pregnancy.

13

The risk factors are the number of prior cesarean sec-

tions, short time interval between the cesarean delivery

and the current pregnancy, and retroversion of the uter-

us which may lead to greater cesarean scar dehiscence, in-

creasing the chance of implantation of the gestational

sac in this region.

14

Transvaginal ultrasound allows early diagnosis of this

disease before tragic outcomes such as uterine rupture

or excessive bleeding and enables conservative treatment

instead of mutilating surgeries such as hysterectomy, spar-

ing fertility.

7

It also allows differential diagnosis with

abortion in progress, molar pregnancy and cervical ecto-

pic pregnancy through the ultrasound diagnostic crite-

ria proposed by Vial in 2000.

Vial et al.

7

have also proposed two types of cesarean

scar ectopic pregnancy: endogenous and exogenous. In

the endogenous type, the implementation of the gesta-

tional sac occurs in the c-section scar with the develop-

ment of the pregnancy into the uterine cavity. The exog-

enous type occurs with deeper implantation of the

gestational sac in the cesarean scar, which with the pro-

gression of the pregnancy may lead to uterine rupture

and hemorrhage in the first trimester of pregnancy.

There is still no consensus on the best mode of treat-

ment in the case of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. The

conduct at our service is drug treatment and outpatient

monitoring with weekly

β

-hCG exams until resolution,

only intervening surgically in the presence of heavy bleed-

ing and under these circumstances, if possible, trying to

perform uterine artery embolization prior to curettage.

15

During the outpatient follow-up, the ultrasound ex-

amination is not performed routinely, and should be re-

FIGURE 2

 Graph with the progression of

b

-hCG values in the treatment of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with local and systemic

methotrexate in this case report.

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0

0

10

20 30 40 50

60 70

b

-hCG (mIU/)mL

7d; 27,073

9d; 23,889

1d; 18,716

23d; 1,477

15d; 6,129

30d; 479

37d; 175

44d; 84.9

51d; 21.8

58d; 2

5d; 24,070

Progression of

b

-hCG values

Values (mIU/mL)

Days (d)

3d; 23,350