Background Image
Previous Page  46 / 83 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 83 Next Page
Page Background

S

asso

GRS

et

al

.

524

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2015; 61(6):524-529

REVIEW ARTICLE

Elevated serum osteoprotegerin levels in women: friend or foe?

G

isela

R

odrigues

da

S

ilva

S

asso

1

*, R

inaldo

F

lorencio

-S

ilva

2

, R

icardo

S

antos

S

imões

3

, M

aria

C

ândida

P

inheiro

B

aracat

4

,

J

osé

M

aria

S

oares

J

únior

5

, E

dmund

C

hada

B

aracat

6

1

PhD – Post-Doctoral Fellow – Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

2

PhD – Post-Doctoral Fellow – Department of Morphology and Genetics, Unifesp, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

3

PhD – Physician – Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

4

MSc student – Physician – Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

5

Prof. Dr. Habilitation (BR: Livre Docência) – Associate Professor in the Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP. Brazil

6

Dr., Full Professor in the Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP. Brazil

S

ummary

Study conducted at Universidade Federal

de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de

Medicina (Unifesp/EPM), Faculdade de

Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

(FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Article received

: 8/7/2015

Accepted for publication:

8/7/2015

*Correspondence:

Address: Disciplina de Histologia e Biologia

Estrutural, Departamento de Morfologia e

Genética da Universidade Federal de São

Paulo – Escola Paulista de Medicina –

UNIFESP/EPM – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento

de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia da Faculdade

de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

– FMUSP – São Paulo (SP), Brasil

gisela.morf@hotmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.61.06.524

Introduction:

osteoprotegerin has emerged as a new candidate for the treat-

ment of osteoporosis. However, high levels of osteoprotegerin have been linked

to vascular calcification, an independent and well-defined risk factor for cardio-

vascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Thus, the action of osteoprotegerin in

these situations has been questioned.

Objective:

to evaluate the effect of osteoprotegerin (OPG) on the human body,

especially in bone tissue and in vascular diseases.

Methods:

the scientific databases consulted were PubMed-Medline and Co-

chrane, using keywords (MeSH terms) grouped into the following syntaxes: (Os-

teoprotegerin OR Osteoclastogenesis Inhibitory Factor OR Receptors, Tumor

Necrosis Factor, Member 11b OR Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfami-

ly, Member 11b OR FDCR-1 Protein OR FDCR 1 Protein OR OCIF Protein OR

Follicular Dendritic Cell-Derived Receptor-1) AND (Bones AND Bone OR Bones

AND Bone Tissue OR Bones OR Bone Tissue OR Cardiovascular Diseases).

Results:

Osteoprotegerin is present in various organs and binds to two ligands:

nuclear factor kB (RANKL) related to the differentiation of osteoclasts, and tu-

mor necrosis factor related to the apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). OPG in-

hibits the regulation effects of nuclear factor kB on inflammation and on the

skeletal and vascular systems, preventing the apoptosis induced by TRAIL, be-

ing related to the preservation of bone tissue.

Conclusion:

a deeper knowledge of the mechanisms involved in the association

between OPG serum levels, bone integrity and cardiovascular disease can pro-

vide important data for future therapeutic interventions.

Keywords:

osteoprotegerin, RANK ligand, receptors, TNF-related apoptosis-in-

ducing ligand, bone.

I

ntroduction

Bone remodeling is a continuous physiological process

that maintains skeletal integrity through bone resorp-

tion by osteoclasts, followed by bone formation by osteo-

blasts. This remodeling results from a time sequence that

lasts six months on average. The remodeling process can

be divided into four stages: 1) activation of osteoclasts

(multinucleate cells responsible for bone resorption) and

their precursors; 2) the resorption of old bone by the os-

teoclasts – which takes about three weeks; 3) end of bone

resorption and 4) bone neoformation by osteoblasts.

1

Osteoporosis is a disorder characterized by decreased

bone strength and increased risk of fracture, which oc-

curs due to an imbalance in the bone remodeling process,

where bone resorption exceeds bone formation. Preven-

tion and treatment currently available for osteoporosis

include bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor

modulators (SERMs), which are antiresorptive agents, as

well as parathyroid hormone analogues such as teripara-

tide, which are the only anabolic agents currently ap-

proved for the treatment of osteoporosis. On the other

hand, side effects and the low efficacy of the treatments