Previous Page  101 / 103 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 103 Next Page
Page Background

C

ytopathologic

evaluation

of

patients

submitted

to

radiotherapy

for

uterine

cervix

cancer

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(4):379-385

385

Palavras-chave:

radioterapia, neoplasias do colo do úte-

ro, efeitos actínicos, citopatologia.

R

eferences

1.

Instituto Nacional de Câncer – INCA. Radioterapia [cited 2016 May]. Available

from:

http://www.inca.gov.br/conteudo_view.asp?ID=100.

2.

Padilha CML, Feliciano GD, Padilha Filho LG. Analysis of actinic effect

after radiotherapy in the uterine cervix carcinomas. J Am Sci. 2006;

2(3):23-28.

3.

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva / INCA. Estimativa

2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer José

Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Rio de

Janeiro: INCA; 2014.

4.

Panobianco MS, Pimentel AV, Almeida AM, Oliveira ISB. Women diagnosed

with advanced cancer of the cervix: coping with the disease and treatment.

Rev Bras Cancerol. 2012; 58(3):517-23.

5. Yuan G, Wu L, Huang M, Li N, An J. A phase II study of concurrent chemo-

radiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin in advanced squamous cell carcinoma

of the uterine cervix. Radiation Oncol. 2014; 9:55.

6.

Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al.;

Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda Sys-

tem: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;

287(16):2114-9.

7.

Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da

Silva / INCA. Nomenclatura Brasileira para Laudos Citopatológicos Cervicais.

Coordenação-Geral de Prevenção e Vigilância, Divisão de Detecção Precoce

e Apoio à Organização de Rede. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Inca; 2012.

8.

Hospital AC Camargo. Manual de condutas em ginecologia oncológica. São

Paulo: FAP; 2010.

9.

Powers CN. Radiation treatment effects in cervical cytology. Diagn Cytopathol.

1995; 13(1):75-80.

10. Zannoni GF, Velone GV, Carbone A. Morphological effects of radiochemo-

therapy on cervical carcinoma: a morphological study of 50 cases of hyste-

rectomy specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;

27(2):274-81.

11. Villas MV, Macedo-Soares TDLVA, Russo GM. Bibliographical research

method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific

journal ranking. Braz Admin Rev. 2008; 5(2):139-59.

12.

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de

pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto

& Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4):758-64.

13. Gil AC. Como delinear uma pesquisa bibliográfica. In: Gil AC, organizer.

Como elaborar projeto de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas; 2002.

14. Okuno E. Efeitos biológicos das radiações ionizantes. Acidente radiológico

de Goiânia. Estud Av. 2013; 27(77):185-99.

15. Okuno E. Radiação: efeitos, riscos e benefícios. São Paulo: Harbra; 1988.

16. Vargas FG, Silva BS, Cardoso CO, Leguisamo N, Moraes CAR, Moraes CV,

et al. Impact of body weight on radiation exposure during invasive cardiac

procedures. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2012; 20(1):63-8.

17.

Souza E, Soares JPM. Correlações técnicas e ocupacionais da radiologia

intervencionista. J Vasc Bras (Porto Alegre). 2008; 7(4):341-50.

18.

Ribeiro EL, Pessoa MB. The effects of electromagnetic radiation in the life

of the human being: An analysis of the environmental paradigm. Rev

Tecnologia e Sociedade. 2007. Available from:

https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.

br/rts/article/download/2502/1616.

19.

Sharma M, Revannasiddaiah S, Gupta M, Seam RK, Gupta Mk, Rastogi M.

Can pure accelerated radiotherapy given as six fractions weekly be an option

in locally advanced carcinoma cervix: results of a prospective randomized

phase III trial. J Can Res Ther. 2016; 12(1):103-8.

20.

Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood, RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T.

DNA repair and mutagenesis. Washington: ASM Press; 2006.

21. Choi JH, Besaratina A, Lee DH, Lee CS, Pfeifer GP. The role of DNA

polymerase iota in UV mutational spectra. Mutat Res. 2006; 599(1-2):58-65.

22.

Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy H. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on

the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004; 195(3):298-308.

23.

Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, Yamada SD, Fleming G,

et al. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gyne-

cologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(5):1330-7.

24.

INCA/MS. Câncer do colo do útero. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2000; 46(4):351-4.

25. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Hybrid capture 2 viral load and the

2-year cumulative risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cancer.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(5):1590-7.

26.

Navarro C, Fonseca AJ, Sibajev A, Souza CIA, Araújo DS, Teles DA, et al.

Cervical cancer screening coverage in a high-incidence region. Rev Saúde

Pública. 2015; 49:17.

27.

Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology:

definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 2. ed. New York: Springer; 2004.

28.

Pinto AP, Maia R. [Adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix mimicking

adenoid basal carcinoma: case report and review of the literature]. J Bras

Patol Med Lab. 2007; 43(1):45-50.

29. Costa MOLP, Heráclio AS, Coelho AV, Acioly VL, Souza PR, Correia MT.

Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou cytology samples with liquid-

-based cervical cytology samples from women in Pernambuco, Brazil. Braz

J Med Biol Res. 2015; 48(9):831-8.

30.

Mcgoogan E, Colgan TJ, Ramzy I, Cochand-Priollet B, Davey DD, Grohs HK,

et al. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International

Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards

the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Acta

Cytol. 1998; 42(1):25-32.

31. Lu CH, Chang CC, Ho ESC, Chen SJ, Lin SJ, Fu TF, et al. Should adequacy

criteria in cervicovaginal cytology be modified after radiotherapy, chemotherapy,

or hysterectomy? Cancer Cytopathol. 2010; 118(6):474-81.

32. Zannoni GF, Velone GV. Accuracy of Papanicolaou smears in cervical cancer

patients treated with radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Am J

Clin Pathol. 2008; 130(5):787-94.

33. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Gibb RK, Rader JS, Davila RM, et al. Liquid-

-based cytology for the postirradiation surveillance of women with gynecologic

malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91(1):134-8.

34. Gupta S, Mukherjee K, Gupta YN, Kumar M. Sequential radiation changes

in cytology of vaginal smears in carcinoma of cervix uteri during radiotherapy.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987; 25(4):303-8.

35.

Shield PW. Chronic radiation effects: a correlative study of smears and biop-

sies from the cervix and vagina. Diagn Cytophatol.1995; 13(2):107-19.

36. Alsharif M, McKeon DM, Gulbahce HE, Savik K, Pambuccian SE.

Unsatisfactory surepath liquid-based Papanicolaou tests: causes and

significance. Cancer. 2009; 117(1):15-26.

37.

Baker JJ. Conventional and liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison

study with clinical and histologic follow-up. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;

27(3):185-8.

38.

Bolick DR, Hellman DJ. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment

of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system. Acta Cytol. 1998;

42(1):209-13.

39.

Bur M, Knowles K, Pekow P, Corral O, Donovan J. Comparison of ThinPrep

preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.

Acta Cytol. 1995; 39(4):631-42.

40. Carpenter AB, Davey DD. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-

-up in a university hospital. Cancer. 1999; 87(3):105-12.

41.

Linder J, Zahniser D. The ThinPrep Pap Test. A review of clinical studies.

Acta Cytol. 1997; 41(1):30-8.

42. Teixeira LA, Porto MAT, Souza LPA. A expansão do rastreio do câncer do

colo do útero e a formação de citotécnicos no Brasil. Physis (Rio J). 2012;

22(2):713-31.

43. Gusberg SB. A consideration of the problem of radiosensitivity in cancer of

the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956; 72(4):804-19.

44. Graham JB, Graham RM, Liu W. Prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix

based on the vaginal smear before treatment; SR: the sensitization response.

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954; 99(5):11.

45.

Murad TM, August C. Radiation-induced atypia. A rewiew. Diagn Cytopathol.

1985; 1(2):135-52.

46.

Shield PW, Wrigth RG, Free K, Daunter B. The accuracy of cervicovaginal

cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma following

radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 41(3):223-9.

47. Davey DD, Gallion H, Jennings CD. DNA cytometry in postirradiation

cervico-vaginal smear. Hum Pathol. 1992; 23(9):1027-31.

48. Wacthel MS, Thaler HT, Gangi MD, Hadju SI. Immunoperoxidase staining

of cervicovaginal smears after radiotherapy. Acta Cytol. 1992; 36(3):305-9.

49.

Masubuchi K, Kubo H, Tenjin Y, Ono M, Yamazaki M. Follow-up studies

by cytology on cancer of the cervix uterine after treatment. Acta Cytol. 1969;

13(6):313-26.