C
ytopathologic
evaluation
of
patients
submitted
to
radiotherapy
for
uterine
cervix
cancer
R
ev
A
ssoc
M
ed
B
ras
2017; 63(4):379-385
385
Palavras-chave:
radioterapia, neoplasias do colo do úte-
ro, efeitos actínicos, citopatologia.
R
eferences
1.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer – INCA. Radioterapia [cited 2016 May]. Available
from:
http://www.inca.gov.br/conteudo_view.asp?ID=100.2.
Padilha CML, Feliciano GD, Padilha Filho LG. Analysis of actinic effect
after radiotherapy in the uterine cervix carcinomas. J Am Sci. 2006;
2(3):23-28.
3.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva / INCA. Estimativa
2016: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer José
Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Rio de
Janeiro: INCA; 2014.
4.
Panobianco MS, Pimentel AV, Almeida AM, Oliveira ISB. Women diagnosed
with advanced cancer of the cervix: coping with the disease and treatment.
Rev Bras Cancerol. 2012; 58(3):517-23.
5. Yuan G, Wu L, Huang M, Li N, An J. A phase II study of concurrent chemo-
radiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin in advanced squamous cell carcinoma
of the uterine cervix. Radiation Oncol. 2014; 9:55.
6.
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al.;
Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda Sys-
tem: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;
287(16):2114-9.
7.
Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da
Silva / INCA. Nomenclatura Brasileira para Laudos Citopatológicos Cervicais.
Coordenação-Geral de Prevenção e Vigilância, Divisão de Detecção Precoce
e Apoio à Organização de Rede. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Inca; 2012.
8.
Hospital AC Camargo. Manual de condutas em ginecologia oncológica. São
Paulo: FAP; 2010.
9.
Powers CN. Radiation treatment effects in cervical cytology. Diagn Cytopathol.
1995; 13(1):75-80.
10. Zannoni GF, Velone GV, Carbone A. Morphological effects of radiochemo-
therapy on cervical carcinoma: a morphological study of 50 cases of hyste-
rectomy specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;
27(2):274-81.
11. Villas MV, Macedo-Soares TDLVA, Russo GM. Bibliographical research
method for business administration studies: a model based on scientific
journal ranking. Braz Admin Rev. 2008; 5(2):139-59.
12.
Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de
pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto
& Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17(4):758-64.
13. Gil AC. Como delinear uma pesquisa bibliográfica. In: Gil AC, organizer.
Como elaborar projeto de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas; 2002.
14. Okuno E. Efeitos biológicos das radiações ionizantes. Acidente radiológico
de Goiânia. Estud Av. 2013; 27(77):185-99.
15. Okuno E. Radiação: efeitos, riscos e benefícios. São Paulo: Harbra; 1988.
16. Vargas FG, Silva BS, Cardoso CO, Leguisamo N, Moraes CAR, Moraes CV,
et al. Impact of body weight on radiation exposure during invasive cardiac
procedures. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. 2012; 20(1):63-8.
17.
Souza E, Soares JPM. Correlações técnicas e ocupacionais da radiologia
intervencionista. J Vasc Bras (Porto Alegre). 2008; 7(4):341-50.
18.
Ribeiro EL, Pessoa MB. The effects of electromagnetic radiation in the life
of the human being: An analysis of the environmental paradigm. Rev
Tecnologia e Sociedade. 2007. Available from:
https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rts/article/download/2502/1616.
19.
Sharma M, Revannasiddaiah S, Gupta M, Seam RK, Gupta Mk, Rastogi M.
Can pure accelerated radiotherapy given as six fractions weekly be an option
in locally advanced carcinoma cervix: results of a prospective randomized
phase III trial. J Can Res Ther. 2016; 12(1):103-8.
20.
Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood, RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T.
DNA repair and mutagenesis. Washington: ASM Press; 2006.
21. Choi JH, Besaratina A, Lee DH, Lee CS, Pfeifer GP. The role of DNA
polymerase iota in UV mutational spectra. Mutat Res. 2006; 599(1-2):58-65.
22.
Matsumura Y, Ananthaswamy H. Toxic effects of ultraviolet radiation on
the skin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004; 195(3):298-308.
23.
Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J, Waggoner SE, Yamada SD, Fleming G,
et al. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gyne-
cologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(5):1330-7.
24.
INCA/MS. Câncer do colo do útero. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2000; 46(4):351-4.
25. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM. Hybrid capture 2 viral load and the
2-year cumulative risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cancer.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(5):1590-7.
26.
Navarro C, Fonseca AJ, Sibajev A, Souza CIA, Araújo DS, Teles DA, et al.
Cervical cancer screening coverage in a high-incidence region. Rev Saúde
Pública. 2015; 49:17.
27.
Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology:
definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 2. ed. New York: Springer; 2004.
28.
Pinto AP, Maia R. [Adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix mimicking
adenoid basal carcinoma: case report and review of the literature]. J Bras
Patol Med Lab. 2007; 43(1):45-50.
29. Costa MOLP, Heráclio AS, Coelho AV, Acioly VL, Souza PR, Correia MT.
Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou cytology samples with liquid-
-based cervical cytology samples from women in Pernambuco, Brazil. Braz
J Med Biol Res. 2015; 48(9):831-8.
30.
Mcgoogan E, Colgan TJ, Ramzy I, Cochand-Priollet B, Davey DD, Grohs HK,
et al. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International
Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards
the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. Acta
Cytol. 1998; 42(1):25-32.
31. Lu CH, Chang CC, Ho ESC, Chen SJ, Lin SJ, Fu TF, et al. Should adequacy
criteria in cervicovaginal cytology be modified after radiotherapy, chemotherapy,
or hysterectomy? Cancer Cytopathol. 2010; 118(6):474-81.
32. Zannoni GF, Velone GV. Accuracy of Papanicolaou smears in cervical cancer
patients treated with radiochemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Am J
Clin Pathol. 2008; 130(5):787-94.
33. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG, Gibb RK, Rader JS, Davila RM, et al. Liquid-
-based cytology for the postirradiation surveillance of women with gynecologic
malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91(1):134-8.
34. Gupta S, Mukherjee K, Gupta YN, Kumar M. Sequential radiation changes
in cytology of vaginal smears in carcinoma of cervix uteri during radiotherapy.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987; 25(4):303-8.
35.
Shield PW. Chronic radiation effects: a correlative study of smears and biop-
sies from the cervix and vagina. Diagn Cytophatol.1995; 13(2):107-19.
36. Alsharif M, McKeon DM, Gulbahce HE, Savik K, Pambuccian SE.
Unsatisfactory surepath liquid-based Papanicolaou tests: causes and
significance. Cancer. 2009; 117(1):15-26.
37.
Baker JJ. Conventional and liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison
study with clinical and histologic follow-up. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;
27(3):185-8.
38.
Bolick DR, Hellman DJ. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment
of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system. Acta Cytol. 1998;
42(1):209-13.
39.
Bur M, Knowles K, Pekow P, Corral O, Donovan J. Comparison of ThinPrep
preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.
Acta Cytol. 1995; 39(4):631-42.
40. Carpenter AB, Davey DD. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-
-up in a university hospital. Cancer. 1999; 87(3):105-12.
41.
Linder J, Zahniser D. The ThinPrep Pap Test. A review of clinical studies.
Acta Cytol. 1997; 41(1):30-8.
42. Teixeira LA, Porto MAT, Souza LPA. A expansão do rastreio do câncer do
colo do útero e a formação de citotécnicos no Brasil. Physis (Rio J). 2012;
22(2):713-31.
43. Gusberg SB. A consideration of the problem of radiosensitivity in cancer of
the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1956; 72(4):804-19.
44. Graham JB, Graham RM, Liu W. Prognosis in cancer of the uterine cervix
based on the vaginal smear before treatment; SR: the sensitization response.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954; 99(5):11.
45.
Murad TM, August C. Radiation-induced atypia. A rewiew. Diagn Cytopathol.
1985; 1(2):135-52.
46.
Shield PW, Wrigth RG, Free K, Daunter B. The accuracy of cervicovaginal
cytology in the detection of recurrent cervical carcinoma following
radiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 41(3):223-9.
47. Davey DD, Gallion H, Jennings CD. DNA cytometry in postirradiation
cervico-vaginal smear. Hum Pathol. 1992; 23(9):1027-31.
48. Wacthel MS, Thaler HT, Gangi MD, Hadju SI. Immunoperoxidase staining
of cervicovaginal smears after radiotherapy. Acta Cytol. 1992; 36(3):305-9.
49.
Masubuchi K, Kubo H, Tenjin Y, Ono M, Yamazaki M. Follow-up studies
by cytology on cancer of the cervix uterine after treatment. Acta Cytol. 1969;
13(6):313-26.