Previous Page  102 / 105 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 105 Next Page
Page Background

H

epner

A

et

al

.

822

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(9):814-823

M.A.P. – Honoraria (BMS, Merck); advisory role (BMS,

Amgen); research funding (BMS)

G.S.F. – Honoraria (Novartis, Mundipharma, Roche);

advisory role (Mundipharma, Roche, Servier); travel

expenses (Bayer, Mundipharma, Novartis, Roche, Ser-

vier); research involvement (BMS, MSD)

R.R.M. – Honoraria (AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ro-

che, Novartis); advisory role (Roche, MSD); travel ex-

penses (AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, TEVA, No-

vartis); research involvement (Lilly, Roche)

R

esumo

Tratamento de melanoma avançado – Um panorama em

transformação

Após décadas de ostracismo, os recentes avanços no trata-

mento do melanoma trouxeram uma nova realidade para

pacientes, médicos e pesquisadores. Enquanto anticorpos

monoclonais voltados a moléculas envolvidas na modula-

ção da interação entre células do melanoma e do sistema

imune consolidaram o uso da “imunoterapia”, ummelhor

conhecimento acerca das aberrações genômicas envolvidas

na carcinogênese do melanoma viabilizaram o desenvolvi-

mento de inibidores da via

mitogen-activated protein kinase

pathway

(MAPK), o que também resultou em ganhos signi-

ficativos em taxas de resposta e sobrevida. Consequente-

mente, novas modalidades de tratamento foram aprovadas

para uso clínico nos Estados Unidos e na Europa, incluin-

do os bloqueadores de correceptores imunes ipilimumabe,

nivolumabe e pembrolizumabe, o herpesvírus oncolítico

talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), e os agentes-alvo vemu-

rafenibe, dabrafenibe, cobimetinibe e trametinibe. Nesse

artigo, revisamos os resultados que trouxeram novas alter-

nativas para a prática clínica e discutimos a incorporação

desses avanços ao cuidado de pacientes no Brasil.

Palavras-chave:

melanoma, anti-PD1, anti-CTLA-4,

BRAF, MEK.

R

eferences

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2016 [cited 2016 Oct

14]. Available from:

http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@

research/

documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf.

2.

Erdei E, Torres SM. A new understanding in the epidemiology of melanoma.

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010; 10(11):1811-23.

3.

Schmerling RA, Loria D, Cinat G, Ramos WE, Cardona AF, Sánchez JL, et

al. Cutaneous melanoma in Latin America: the need for more data. Rev

Panam Salud Publica. 2011; 30(5):431-8.

4.

INCA. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Estimativa 2016. Incidência d0 câncer

no Brasil. [cited 2016 Oct 14]. Available from:

http://www.inca.gov.br/

estimativa/2016/estimativa-2016-v11.pdf.

5.

Bhatia S, Tykodi SS, Thompson JA. Treatment of metastatic melanoma: an

overview. Oncology. 2009; 23(6):488-96.

6. Atkins MB, Kunkel L, Sznol M, Rosenberg SA. High-dose recombinant

interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: long-term

survival update. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000; 6(Suppl 1):S11-4.

7. Yajima I, Kumasaka MY, Thang ND, Goto Y, Takeda K, Yamanoshita O, et

al. RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT signaling in malignant

melanoma progression and therapy. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012; 2012:354191.

8.

Kim KB, Kefford R, Pavlick AC, Infante JR, Ribas A, Sosman JA et al. Phase

II study of the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor Trametinib in patients with metastatic

BRAF-mutant cutaneous melanoma previously treated with or without a

BRAF inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(4):482-9.

9. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous

melanoma. Cell. 2015; 161(7):1681-96.

10.

Hodi FS, Kluger H, Sznol M, Carvajal R, Lawrence D, Atkins M, et al. Durable,

long-term survival in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma

(MEL) who received nivolumab (NIVO) monotherapy in a phase I trial.

Cancer Res. 2016; 76(14 Suppl):abst CT001.

11.

Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, Haydu LE, Hamilton AL, Mann GJ, et

al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in

metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(10):1239-46.

12.

Flaherty KT, Lee SJ, Schuchter LM, Flaherty LE, Wright JJ, Leming PD, et

al Final results of E2603: a double-blind, randomized phase III trial comparing

carboplatin (C)/paclitaxel (P) with or without sorafenib (S) in metastatic

melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(Suppl):613s.

13.

McArthur GA, Chapman PB, Robert C, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Dummer R, et

al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF (V600E) and BRAF (V600F)

mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3,

randomized, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(3):323-32.

14.

Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, Millward M, et al.

Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-

label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 380(9839):358-65.

15. Hauschild A, Grob JJ, Demidov LV, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, MillwardM, et al. An

update on BREAK-3, a phase III, randomized trial: Dabrafenib versus dacarbazine

in patients with BRAF V600E-positive mutation metastatic melanoma. J Clin

Oncol. 2013; 31(Suppl):abstr9013. [2013 ASCO Annual Meeting].

16.

Rizos H, Menzies AM, Pupo GM, Carlino MS, Fung C, Hyman J, et al. BRAF

inhibitor resistance mechanisms in metastatic melanoma: spectrum and

clinical impact. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(7):1965-77.

17.

Flaherty KT, Robert C, Hersey P, Nathan P, Garbe C, Milhem M, et al.;

METRIC Study Group. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF

mutated melanoma. N Eng J Med. 2012; 367(2):107-14.

18.

Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A,

Stroiakovski D, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined

dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(1):30-9.

19. Ascierto PA, McArthur GA, Dréno B, Atkinson V, Liszkay G, Di Giacomo

AM, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAFV600-

mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised,

double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(9):1248-60.

20.

Long GV,Stroyakovsky DL, Gogas H, Levchenko E, de Braud F, Larkin J, et

al. COMBI-d: A randomized, double-blinded, Phase III study comparing

the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib to dabrafenib and trametinib

placebo as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with unressectable or metastatic

BRAFV600E/K mutation-positive cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;

32 (Suppl):abstr9011.[ 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting]

21. Grob JJ, Amonkar MM, Karaszemska B, Schacther J, Dummer R, Mackiewicz

A, et al. Comparasion of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy

with vemurafenib monotherapy on health-realted quality of life in patients

with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous BRAFal600-mutation-positive

melanoma (COMBI-v): results of a phase 3, open-label, randomized trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(13):1389-98.

22.

Flaherty K, Davies MA, Grob JJ, Long GV, Nathan PD, Ribas A, et al. Genomic

analysis and 3-y efficacy and safety update of COMBI-d: a phase 3 study of

dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) vs D monotherapy in patients (pts) with

unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K mutant cutaneous melanoma.

J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(Suppl):abstr9502. [2016 ASCO Annual Meeting]

23.

Robert C, Karazewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, Stroyakovsiy

D, et al. Three-year estimate of overall survival in COMBI-v, a randomized

phase 3 study evaluating first-line dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) in patients

(pts) with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant cutaneous

melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(Suppl 6):LBA40.