Background Image
Previous Page  14 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

S

imões

R

et

al

.

108

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(2):108-115

GUIDELINES IN FOCUS

Zika virus infection and pregnancy

I

nfecção

pelo

vírus

Z

ika

e

gravidez

Authorship:

Associação Médica Brasileira

Final Draft:

March 18, 2016

Participants:

Ricardo Simões

1,2

, Renata Buzzini², Wanderley Bernardo², Florentino Cardoso², Antônio Salomão¹,

Giovanni Cerri²

1

Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (Febrasgo)

2

Guidelines Project, Associação Médica Brasileira

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.02.108

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standard-

ize procedures to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors.

The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, de-

pending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

D

escription

of

the

evidence

colection

method

The literature review of scientific articles in this guideline

was held in the databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane,

using the terms (MeSH terms) individually or grouped,

structured according to P.I.C.O. (“Patient”, “Interven-

tion”, “Control” and

Outcome

) methodology. After

carefully reading the titles and abstracts, only articles con-

taining relevant information to the components of P.I.C.O.

were included. The studies were analyzed for relevance

and level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for

Evidence Based Medicine

1

(

D

) table.

G

rade

of

recommendation

and

strength

of

evidence

A.

Experimental or observational studies of higher con-

sistency.

B.

Experimental or observational studies of lower con-

sistency.

C.

Case reports/non-controlled studies.

D.

Opinions without critical evaluation, based on con-

sensus, physiological studies, or animal models.

O

bjective

This guideline is intended for physicians, nurses, public

health officials and patients at risk of Zika virus infec-

tion, with the purpose of assessing the effects on the pe-

riod of pregnancy and postpartum.

C

onflict

of

interest

No conflict of interest was declared by the participants

in the development of this guideline.

I

ntroduction

The Zika virus, first isolated in 1947 in rhesus monkeys in

the Zika forest in Uganda, is an arbovirus, member of the

Flaviviridae family and the flavivirus genus. First found in

humans in Nigeria in 1954, for 50 years the virus was de-

scribed as a cause of sporadic human infections in Africa

and Asia, until in 2007 an epidemic took place in

Micronesia.

2,3

(

C

) More recently, outbreaks were identified

in 15 different islands of Polynesia. The Ministry of Health

of Brazil, as verified by the data provided by the Live Births

Information System (SINASC), has recorded substantial

increase in the number of cases of microcephaly (Chart 1)

in the country after a high incidence of infection. The clin-

ical features and natural history of Zika infection are based

on a limited number of case reports; however, it is clear

that vertical transmission of the virus can occur during

pregnancy, as seen in a series of reports of cases of micro-

cephaly among children whose mothers were infected with

Zika virus.

4,5

(

C

)

6

(

D

)

According to an epidemiological report for monitor-

ing cases of microcephaly in Brazil, until February 6, 2016,

75.8% of the cases reported (3,852/5,079) remained under

investigation, of which 62.5% (n=3,174) were reported in

2015 and 37.5% (n=1,905) in 2016.

7

(

D

) According to the

final classification, 24.2% of the total cases were investigat-

ed and classified and, of these, 15.1% (n=765) were discard-

ed for the presence of microcephaly and/or changes in the

central nervous system suggestive of congenital infection.

Of the remaining, 9.1% (462/5,079) were confirmed accord-

ing to specific protocol definitions (Charts 1 and 2, and

Annex) and, of these, only 8.9%, i.e., 41 out of 462, were

confirmed as associated with infection with Zika virus by