Background Image
Previous Page  98 / 105 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 98 / 105 Next Page
Page Background

O

liveira

VM

de

et

al

.

288

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(3):287-293

of 32.8%, between 28 and 90 days, in the Supine group, and

16% in the Prone group, with a relative risk reduction of

approximately 50%, and 16% absolute risk reduction. Five

years of training and experience of the team led to mini-

mal complications.

Reports in the literature suggest that the incidence

of adverse events is significantly reduced with a trained

team, experienced in the process.

4,9,10,27

By analyzing the studies, there are some important con-

siderations for clinical practice concerning the mandatory

use of protective mechanical ventilation, prolonged dura-

tion of prone positioning and the need for team training.

M

ethod

The study method included search on the following elec-

tronic databases: Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Library.

Original research or systematic reviews were retrieved, with-

out restrictions on language, including articles from 1995

to November 2, 2014. Studies that were excluded used pa-

tients younger than 18 years or investigations in animals.

The following MESH terms were used: (“prone

position”[MeSH Terms]) OR Prone [TextWord]) OR

prone[Text Word]) OR proning[Text Word])) AND ((“In-

tensive Care”[Mesh]) OR “Intensive Care”[Text Word])

AND (“Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult”[MeSH

Terms]) OR Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult[Text

Word]) OR ARDS [Text Word]).

L

iterature

review

Indications

Patients who presented with moderate or severe ARDS

with a PaO

2

/FiO

2

ratio ≤150 mmHg, refractory hypox-

emia (PEEP >10 cmH

2

O and FiO

2

>60%) in the first 12-

24 hours on protective mechanical ventilation (MV), and/

or difficulty in maintaining protective mechanical ven-

tilation (alveolar distension pressure ≤ 15 cmH

2

O, pla-

teau pressure <30 cmH

2

O, AFV (air flow volume) of 4-6

mL/kg of ideal weight and pH >7.15), and/or those pa-

tients with right ventricular dysfunction (VD) on echo-

cardiography.

9,10,29,30

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications: Hemodynamic instabili-

ty (regarded as progressive elevation of the vasopres-

sor), acute arrhythmia (need to reassess, when reversed

or controlled), pregnancy (second or third trimester),

face trauma or surgery, maxillofacial polytrauma (frac-

ture of the pelvis, external fixation of fractures, rib or

sternum fracture), intracranial hypertension, frequent

convulsions, instability of the spine, abdominal com-

partment syndrome, recent sternotomy, cardiac sur-

gery, ophthalmic surgery (increased intraocular pres-

sure) and recent abdominal surgery or intestinal

ischemia.

Relative contraindications: Bronchopleural fistula, he-

moptysis/alveolar hemorrhage, recent tracheostomy

(within the first 24 hours), significant abnormalities of

the ribcage/kyphoscoliosis; high intra-abdominal pres-

sure above 20 mmHg, without signs of compartmental

syndrome and pregnancy (in the first trimester).

9,10,18,29,31

Start time and duration of prone positioning

The biggest benefit of prone positioning occurs in the ear-

ly stage of moderate or severe ARDS. Several studies have

applied the position in the first 12-24 hours of early diag-

nosis of ARDS, after stabilization of symptoms.

4,10,29,31

The duration of the position seems to be responsible

for the reduction in mortality.

4,13,14

A recent clinical trial

has applied this procedure for 16-20 hours, with an aver-

age time of 17 hours and a significant reduction in the

absolute risk (16%) of death.

4

Therefore, the current literature suggests that prone

positioning should be performed in the first 12-24 hours

of diagnosis of moderate or severe ARDS, after stabiliza-

tion of the symptoms, and that the duration of the pro-

cedure must be no less than 16 hours.

Response criteria to prone positioning

Response to prone positioning should be assessed using

blood gas tests collected after 2 hours of prone, and pa-

tients who have increases in the PaO

2

/FiO

2

ratio of 20

mmHg or an increase in PaO

2

>10 mmHg compared with

supine position are considered responsive.

4,10,30

Time for stopping prone positioning

Recently, Guerin et al.

4

suggest a daily re-evaluation of

the need for the prone positioning. The procedure should

be stopped when ventilation or complications improve.

Ventilatory improvement

PaO

2

/FiO

2

ratio >150 mmHg with PEEP ≤10 cmH

2

O

and FiO

2

<60% in supine position, for at least 4 hours

after the end of the last prone session;

decreased PaO

2

/FiO

2

ratio greater than 20% in com-

parison to the supine position after two prone ses-

sions.

Complications

dislocation of the respiratory prosthesis;

obstruction of the endotracheal tube, hemoptysis;