G
ood
practices
for
prone
positioning
at
the
bedside
: C
onstruction
of
a
care
protocol
R
ev
A
ssoc
M
ed
B
ras
2016; 62(3):287-293
287
REVIEW ARTICLE
Good practices for prone positioning at the bedside: Construction
of a care protocol
V
anessa
M
artins
de
O
liveira
¹
*, M
ichele
E
lisa
W
eschenfelder
²
, G
racieli
D
eponti
³
, R
obledo
C
ondessa
3
, S
ergio
H
enrique
L
oss
4
,
P
atrícia
M
aurello
B
airros
2
, T
hais
H
ochegger
2
, R
ogério
D
aroncho
2
, B
ibiana
R
ubin
5
, M
arcele
C
histé
2
, D
anusa
C
assiana
R
igo
B
atista
2
, D
eise
M
aria
B
assegio
2
, W
agner
da
S
ilva
N
auer
3
, D
aniele
M
artins
P
iekala
6
, S
ilvia
D
aniela
M
inossi
2
,
V
anessa
F
umaco
da
R
osa
dos
S
antos
2
, J
osue
V
ictorino
7
, S
ilvia
R
egina
R
ios
V
ieira
8
1
MD – Intensive Care Unit, Coordinator of the Multidisciplinary Group of Teaching and Research in PRONE of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2
Undergraduate Diploma Nurse at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3
MSc Physiotherapist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
4
PhD Intensive Care Physician and Nutrologist, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
5
Undergraduate Diploma Nutritionist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
6
Undergraduate Diploma Physiotherapist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
7
PhD Physician at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
8
PhD Supervising Physician at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
S
ummary
Study conducted by the Grupo de Prona
do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
(HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Article received:
5/2/2015
Accepted for publication:
12/1/2015
*Correspondence:
Address: Rua Maranguape, 81/802,
Petrópolis
Porto Alegre, RS – Brazil
Postal code: 90690-380
vanessa.oliveira480@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.03.287Last year, interest in prone positioning to treat acute respiratory distress syn-
drome (ARDS) resurfaced with the demonstration of a reduction in mortality
by a large randomized clinical trial. Reports in the literature suggest that the in-
cidence of adverse events is significantly reduced with a team trained and expe-
rienced in the process. The objective of this review is to revisit the current evi-
dence in the literature, discuss and propose the construction of a protocol of
care for these patients. A search was performed on the main electronic databas-
es: Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Library. Prone positioning is increasingly used
in daily practice, with properly trained staff and a well established care protocol
are essencial.
Keywords:
adult respiratory distress syndrome, acute respiratory distress syn-
drome, ventral decubitus, respiratory failure, intensive therapy.
I
ntroduction
Prone positioning has been studied as a strategy for the
treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
since 1974, gaining popularity for improving hypoxemia
in 70% of cases.
1,2
The incidence of this syndrome has not
changed in Europe over the last ten years and mortality
remains high (40-50%) despite technological and thera-
peutic developments in recent decades.
3,4
The significant
improvement of hypoxemia can be attested through nu-
merous mechanisms, among which we can observe a more
uniform distribution of transpulmonary pressure and the
generation of more negative pleural pressures, promoting
the improvement of the ventilation/perfusion ratio.
5-10
Reduction in mortality with prone positioning is at-
tributed to the lowest degree of pulmonary stress and
strain, given that air distribution is more homogeneous
and slower.
9,10,12-15
The various meta-analyses in the liter-
ature to date concluded that there was an improvement
in oxygenation, but no reduction in mortality.
16,17,19,26
The conflicting results of studies and meta-analy-
ses,
11,18,20-26,28
relating to mortality can be explained by the
heterogeneity among patients regarding confusion fac-
tors such as the severity of the pulmonary injury, the ven-
tilation strategy applied, and the different times for be-
ginning and the duration of prone positioning.
18
Therefore, Guerin et al.
4
designed a randomized study
(Proseva) with 466 patients with moderate ARDS in the
first 12-24 hours of diagnosis, using a homogeneous sam-
ple of considerable size. All patients underwent protec-
tive mechanical ventilation, with the duration of prone
positioning lasting on average 17 hours. This investiga-
tion demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality