Background Image
Previous Page  97 / 105 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 105 Next Page
Page Background

G

ood

practices

for

prone

positioning

at

the

bedside

: C

onstruction

of

a

care

protocol

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(3):287-293

287

REVIEW ARTICLE

Good practices for prone positioning at the bedside: Construction

of a care protocol

V

anessa

M

artins

de

O

liveira

¹

*, M

ichele

E

lisa

W

eschenfelder

²

, G

racieli

D

eponti

³

, R

obledo

C

ondessa

3

, S

ergio

H

enrique

L

oss

4

,

P

atrícia

M

aurello

B

airros

2

, T

hais

H

ochegger

2

, R

ogério

D

aroncho

2

, B

ibiana

R

ubin

5

, M

arcele

C

histé

2

, D

anusa

C

assiana

R

igo

B

atista

2

, D

eise

M

aria

B

assegio

2

, W

agner

da

S

ilva

N

auer

3

, D

aniele

M

artins

P

iekala

6

, S

ilvia

D

aniela

M

inossi

2

,

V

anessa

F

umaco

da

R

osa

dos

S

antos

2

, J

osue

V

ictorino

7

, S

ilvia

R

egina

R

ios

V

ieira

8

1

MD – Intensive Care Unit, Coordinator of the Multidisciplinary Group of Teaching and Research in PRONE of the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

2

Undergraduate Diploma Nurse at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

3

MSc Physiotherapist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

4

PhD Intensive Care Physician and Nutrologist, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

5

Undergraduate Diploma Nutritionist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

6

Undergraduate Diploma Physiotherapist at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

7

PhD Physician at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

8

PhD Supervising Physician at the Intensive Care Unit, HCPA, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

S

ummary

Study conducted by the Grupo de Prona

do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

(HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Article received:

5/2/2015

Accepted for publication:

12/1/2015

*Correspondence:

Address: Rua Maranguape, 81/802,

Petrópolis

Porto Alegre, RS – Brazil

Postal code: 90690-380

vanessa.oliveira480@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.03.287

Last year, interest in prone positioning to treat acute respiratory distress syn-

drome (ARDS) resurfaced with the demonstration of a reduction in mortality

by a large randomized clinical trial. Reports in the literature suggest that the in-

cidence of adverse events is significantly reduced with a team trained and expe-

rienced in the process. The objective of this review is to revisit the current evi-

dence in the literature, discuss and propose the construction of a protocol of

care for these patients. A search was performed on the main electronic databas-

es: Medline, Lilacs and Cochrane Library. Prone positioning is increasingly used

in daily practice, with properly trained staff and a well established care protocol

are essencial.

Keywords:

adult respiratory distress syndrome, acute respiratory distress syn-

drome, ventral decubitus, respiratory failure, intensive therapy.

I

ntroduction

Prone positioning has been studied as a strategy for the

treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

since 1974, gaining popularity for improving hypoxemia

in 70% of cases.

1,2

The incidence of this syndrome has not

changed in Europe over the last ten years and mortality

remains high (40-50%) despite technological and thera-

peutic developments in recent decades.

3,4

The significant

improvement of hypoxemia can be attested through nu-

merous mechanisms, among which we can observe a more

uniform distribution of transpulmonary pressure and the

generation of more negative pleural pressures, promoting

the improvement of the ventilation/perfusion ratio.

5-10

Reduction in mortality with prone positioning is at-

tributed to the lowest degree of pulmonary stress and

strain, given that air distribution is more homogeneous

and slower.

9,10,12-15

The various meta-analyses in the liter-

ature to date concluded that there was an improvement

in oxygenation, but no reduction in mortality.

16,17,19,26

The conflicting results of studies and meta-analy-

ses,

11,18,20-26,28

relating to mortality can be explained by the

heterogeneity among patients regarding confusion fac-

tors such as the severity of the pulmonary injury, the ven-

tilation strategy applied, and the different times for be-

ginning and the duration of prone positioning.

18

Therefore, Guerin et al.

4

designed a randomized study

(Proseva) with 466 patients with moderate ARDS in the

first 12-24 hours of diagnosis, using a homogeneous sam-

ple of considerable size. All patients underwent protec-

tive mechanical ventilation, with the duration of prone

positioning lasting on average 17 hours. This investiga-

tion demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality