S
imões
R
et
al
.
392
R
ev
A
ssoc
M
ed
B
ras
2015; 61(5):391-402
•
•
O:
Maternal, perinatal and neonatal morbidity and
mortality.
Bases of scientific data consulted
The scientific databases consulted were: PubMed-Med-
line and Cochrane. Manual search from revisions refer-
ences (narrative or systematic) was also performed.
Strategies for search of evidence
PubMed-Medline
Strategy:
(Cesarean Section OR Cesarean Sections OR De-
livery, Abdominal OR Abdominal Deliveries ORDeliveries,
Abdominal OR Caesarean Section OR Caesarean Sections
OR Abdominal Delivery OR C-Section OR C Section OR C-
Sections OR Postcesarean Section) AND (Breech Presenta-
tion OR Fetal Presentation, Breech OR Breech Fetal Presen-
tationOR Presentation, Breech Fetal OR Labor Presentation,
Breech OR Breech Labor Presentation OR Presentation,
Breech Labor OR Presentation, Breech OR Frank Breech
Presentation OR Breech Presentation, Frank OR Presenta-
tion, Frank Breech OR Incomplete Breech OR Breech, In-
complete OR Complete Breech OR Breech, Complete).
Cochrane
Strategy:
cesarean section AND breech presentation.
Studies retrieved (4/15/2014)
TABLE 1
Number of studies retrieved with the search
strategies used for each scientific database.
Database
Number of studies
Primary
PubMed-Medline
1,943
Cochrane
91
Inclusion criteira for studies retrieved
Selection of studies, assessment of titles and abstracts ob-
tained from the search strategy in the consulted databas-
es was conducted by two researchers with skills in the prep-
aration of systematic reviews, both independent and
blinded, strictly observing the inclusion and exclusion cri-
teria previously established. All potentially relevant stud-
ies were identified. Whenever the title and the summary
were not enlightening, researchers sought the full article.
Study design
Narrative reviews, case reports, case series and studies pre-
senting preliminary results were excluded from the as-
sessment. Systematic reviews and meta-analyzes were used
with the basic purpose of recovering references that per-
haps had been lost at first, from the initial search strate-
gy. Studies designed as cohort or controlled clinical tri-
als (randomized or not) were included.
Cohort studies were defined as those with follow-up
of patients, the same history, and analysis of prognostic
outcomes.
Controlled clinical trials were evaluated according to
the Jadad score.
6
P.I.C.O. Components
•
•
Patient: nulliparous or multiparous women in labor
of a term singleton live fetus (gestational age ≥ 37
weeks), in breech position (complete or incomplete).
•
•
Intervention: cesarean-section.
•
•
Comparison: vaginal delivery.
•
•
Outcome: the outcomes were divided into maternal and
newborn outcomes. Maternal outcomes include early
and late endpoints. The early maternal outcomes are:
maternal death or severe maternal morbidity (admis-
sion to ICU, sepsis and organ failure), bleeding compli-
cations (postpartum hemorrhage, anemia, and need for
blood transfusion after childbirth) and complications
of surgical wound (wound infection, dehiscence or pain).
Late maternal outcomes include: complications in breast-
feeding, perineal pain, abdominal pain, dyspareunia,
urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, genital dysto-
pia, recurring cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancy,
and uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancy.
Newborn outcomes, in turn, include: perinatal or neo-
natal death (excluding cases of death related to fatal fe-
tal abnormalities), neonatal morbidity such as seizures
(occurring within the first 24 hours of birth or that re-
quire two or more drugs to control), Apgar score, birth
asphyxia, respiratory complications, infection, need for
admission into neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal
encephalopathy, trauma at birth (bone fractures, subdu-
ral hematoma, cerebral or intraventricular hemorrhage),
spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve injury (e.g., brachial
plexus injury), disabilities in childhood, hypotonia, in-
tubation or need for ventilation for at least 24 hours, and
need for tube feeding for four days or longer.
Language
Studies available in Portuguese, English, French or Span-
ish were included.
According to publication
Only studies with full text available were considered for
critical assessment.