Previous Page  7 / 70 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 70 Next Page
Page Background

T

ruzzi

JC

et

al

.

664

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2017; 63(8):664-680

GUIDELINES IN FOCUS

Male urinary incontinence: Artificial sphincter

I

ncontinência

urinária masculina

: E

sfíncter

artificial

Authorship:

Brazilian Society of Urology (SBU)

Participants:

José Carlos Truzzi

1

, Carlos R. Sacomani

2

, José Prezotti

3

, Antônio Silvinato

4

,

Wanderley Marques Bernardo

4

Final draft:

July 2017

1

Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

2

Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center

3

Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia

4

Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.08.664

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize

procedures to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors.

The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending

on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

I

ntroduction

Patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency include men

who have undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy

(including laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prosta-

tectomy), radical perineal prostatectomy, or transurethral

resection of the prostate (TURP), patients with previous

pelvic trauma or history of pelvic radiation, women who

have undergone failed anti-incontinence procedures, and

patients with spinal cord injury, myelomeningocele or

other causes of neurogenic bladder, in which intrinsic

sphincter dysfunction may also exist. Urinary incontinence

after radical prostatectomy (UIRP) is the most common

indication for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implanta-

tion.

1,2

The main etiology of UIRP is sphincter deficiency

in up to 90% of cases, either alone or combined with de-

trusor overactivity (DO).

3

The placement of the artificial urinary sphincter should

be postponed for at least 6 months to 1 year, given that a

portion of the patients redevelop urinary continence in

this period. The AmericanMedical Systems 800 (AMS 800)

artificial urinary sphincter is the most widely-used device

and is considered the gold standard in the treatment of

urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter defi-

ciency, working based on hydraulic mechanics.

4

The system

consists of a cuff connected to a reservoir balloon through

a pump. The three components are connected with torsion

resistant tubes.

5

The sizes (lengths) of the cuffs range from

3.5 cm to 5.5 cm in 0.5 cm increments. The cuff can be

implanted in the bulbar urethra (most common) or in the

bladder neck. During rest, the reservoir pressure is trans-

mitted to the cuff, causing continence. Digital compression

of the pump promotes the transfer of liquid from the cuff

to the reservoir, relieving urethral compression and allow-

ing urination. After a period of time (3-5 minutes), the

liquid is transferred back into the cuff by compressing the

urethra or bladder neck, providing continence. The reser-

voir balloons come in three preset pressures: 51-60, 61-70,

71-80 cm of water; the lowest pressure required to close

the urethra should be used. Migration of components may

occur if the cuff is poorly dimensioned, if the pump or

balloon is not positioned correctly or if the pipe lengths

are incorrect.

6

The standard placement of an AUS involves a small

incision made in the patient’s perineum or scrotum. Per-

ineal access is considered the most common;

7

however,

authors have also described the scrotal technique, thus,

the advantages and disadvantages of each should be con-

sidered by the surgeon.

8

The “cuff,” which is the portion of the device that

surrounds and obstructs the urethra, is usually placed

directly around the urethra (i.e., the “standard” placement).

Another variation for cuff placement is the transcorporal

(TC) approach. This technique avoids the posterior ure-

thral dissection as well as of the corpora cavernosum. The

dorsal dissection plane for cuff placement is through the

septum of the corpora cavernosa from one side to the

other, resulting in a portion of the ventral tunica albu-

ginea acting as a cushion between the cuff and the dorsal