T
eixeira
MZ
102
R
ev
A
ssoc
M
ed
B
ras
2017; 63(2):100-108
scribed, in recent medical literature, the occurrence of
secondary and opposite reactions of the organism after
the primary actions of different drugs, confirming the
homeopathic postulate. As mentioned previously, this
secondary action or organism’s reaction, which manifests
itself automatically and instinctively in order to maintain
the homeostasis of the system, is described by contem-
porary pharmacology and physiology as the rebound
effect of the drugs, or paradoxical reaction of the organ-
ism, respectively. Analogously, the primary action of the
drugs cited by Hahnemann corresponds to the therapeu-
tic, adverse and collateral effects of modern drugs.
According to evidence from experimental and clinical
pharmacology,
2-13
the rebound effect of modern drugs
presents similar characteristics to the secondary action or
the reaction of the organism described by the homeo-
pathic model (
Organon of medicine,
§ 59, 64, 69):
36
(i) it
causes an opposite reaction of the organism with greater
intensity than the primary action of the drug; (ii) it occurs
after the primary action of the drug as an automatic man-
ifestation of the organism; (iii) it is independent of the
drug, dose, duration of treatment or the type of symptom
(illness); (iv) its magnitude is proportional to the primary
action of the drug; and (v) it only manifests in susceptible
individuals (idiosyncratic character).
According to the extensive literature,
2-13
several studies
illustrate the universality of the rebound phenomenon in
relation to the distinct classes of palliative drugs (antiangi-
nal, antihypertensive, antiarrhythmic, antithrombotic, and
antihyperlipidemic agents, anxiolytics, sedative-hypnotics,
neurostimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-
-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, diuretics, bronchodilators,
anti-dyspeptics, bone antiresorptive agents, and immuno-
modulators, among others), showing aggravation of the
signs and symptoms initially suppressed by the primary
and direct action of the drug, after its discontinuation.
By definition, the rebound effect presents an inten-
sity and/or frequency a few times higher than the corre-
sponding baseline symptoms suppressed by the primary
action of the antipathic drug, a characteristic that distin-
guishes the rebound phenomenon from the natural reap-
pearance of chronic symptoms after the end of treatment.
Epidemiological studies show that this magnitude can
cause severe and fatal events after the suspension of cer-
tain classes of drugs (antithrombotics, antidepressants,
bronchodilators, anti-dyspeptics and immunomodulators,
among others).
4-13
The rebound effect manifests itself at different intervals
(hours to weeks) after the exhaustion of the biological effect
(half-life) of the drug, and its duration is also variable. De-
spite the suspension or discontinuation of the drug being
a prerequisite for the manifestation of the rebound effect,
given that the primary action of the drug persists while the
receptors are being stimulated (biological half-life), studies
show that the rebound effect may also occur in the course
of treatment due to therapeutic failure or the development
of tolerance, tachyphylaxis or desensitization. On the
other hand, a slow and gradual reduction of doses (taper-
ing) to prevent abrupt discontinuation can minimize the
occurrence of the rebound effect.
2-13
In analogy to the proposal to be detailed below, reports
in the literature describe the use of conventional drugs
according to therapeutic similarity. Among these, we can
cite the use of biphasic oral contraceptives to promote
ovulation and rebound pregnancy in women with func-
tional sterility and the use of central nervous system
stimulants (methylphenidate) to treat attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
39,40
P
aradoxical
pharmacology
14-26
A strategy suggested by Richard A. Bond in 2001,
14
para-
doxical pharmacology proposes the therapeutic use of the
paradoxical effects of drugs (secondary reactions of the
organism with the opposite nature to the primary effects
of the drugs). Universal in nature, such paradoxical, bidi-
rectional or compensatory effects appear in several class-
es of drugs, regardless of the dose, and affect various per-
centages of individuals. Although not fully elucidated, this
paradoxical effect is manifested at different levels of the
biological self-regulation systems, increasing the func-
tional complexity of the entire organism, from subcellular
components (channels, enzymes, receptors, transporters,
organelles, etc.) to cells, tissues and organs.
15-19
Present in any physiological system, these paradoxical
and bidirectional effects occur due to varying mechanisms:
different actions on the same receptor, due to temporal
effects (for example, beta-blockers with intrinsic sympa-
thomimetic activity); stereochemical effects (for example,
salbutamol); multiple receptor targets, with or without
associated temporal effects (for example, procainamide);
antibody-mediated reactions (for example, heparin-in-
duced thromboembolism); pharmacokinetic effects of
competing compartments (for example, bicarbonate);
interruption and non-linear effects on systems (for ex-
ample, dopaminergic agents); systemic overcompensation
(for example, antiretroviral therapy and immune recon-
stitution inflammatory syndrome); other higher level
feedback mechanisms (for example, digoxin) and multi-
level feedback cycles (for example, isotretinoin-associated
acne fulminant), and more.
19