Previous Page  18 / 105 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 105 Next Page
Page Background

A

ras

A

et

al

.

622

R

ev

A

ssoc

M

ed

B

ras

2016; 62(7):622-627

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant

versus

non-pregnant

women: A comparative study

A

bbas

A

ras

1

*, E

rbil

K

araman

2

, Ç

a

ğ

han

pek

ş

en

3

, R

emzi

K

ızıltan

1

, M

ehmet

Ç

etin

K

otan

4

1

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

2

Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

3

Research Assistant, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

4

Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

S

ummary

Study conducted at the

Department of General Surgery

and at the Department of Obstetrics

and Gynecology, School of Medicine,

Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey

Article received:

6/26/2015

Accepted for publication:

9/28/2015

*Correspondence:

Address: Merkez kampus, 65000

Van – Turkey

abbasaras76@gmail.com http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.62.07.622

Objective:

To investigate whether the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is affected

by pregnancy or not.

Method:

A retrospective study with the analysis of the medical records of all

women suspected of having appendicitis who underwent appendectomy at our

hospital between June 2010 and March 2015 were reviewed. The patients were

divided into two groups according to whether they were pregnant or not during

the surgery: group I, pregnant women, and group II, non-pregnant women.

Results:

During the study period, 38 pregnant women and 169 non-pregnant

women underwent appendectomy. The time from admission to the operation

was not statistically different (2.17±1.47 days in group I

vs

. 1.98±1.66 day in

group II; p=0.288). The pregnant group had longer hospital stay than the non-

pregnant group (p=0.04). Ultrasonography (USG) was used as the first diagnos-

tic modality in 36/38 patients in group I and 161/169 in group II. The non-vi-

sualized appendix on ultrasound was seen in 17 patients in group I and 51

patients in group II, which was not statistically different. Sensitivity and specific-

ity of USG in diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 61.29 and 80.00% in group I,

and 93.0 and 31.6% in group II, respectively.

Conclusion:

Although the diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women is not

delayed, careful assessment of these patients suspected of having appendicitis

should be encouraged when USG examination is normal or nondiagnostic.

Keywords:

appendicitis, pregnancy, ultrasonography, diagnosis.

I

ntroduction

Appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric surgical

emergency during pregnancy, occurring in 1 in 1,000

births reported by a large cohort study including 7,114

pregnant women with appendicitis.

1

The diagnosis of

appendicitis during pregnancy is challenging and it is

reported that 25 to 50% of patients had incorrect preop-

erative diagnosis for several reasons.

2

Due to the symptoms

and complaints such as nausea, loss of appetite, vomiting,

and mild-lower abdominal pain are frequent during the

normal pregnancy and also in acute appendicitis, it is

reasonable to make efforts to increase and facilitate the

early diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

3

It has been reported that any delay or misdiagnosis

of acute appendicitis will eventually result in perforated

or complex appendicitis with peritonitis, which is associ-

ated with high rates of early delivery, miscarriage, and

fetal loss.

4

Despite the tendency to late diagnosis of acute

appendicitis during pregnancy, it is reported up to 23%

of negative appendectomy rate.

5

However, a recent study

reported that higher rates of adverse obstetric outcomes

were observed amongst pregnant women with negative

appendectomy.

6

Ultrasonography (USG) is a non-invasive

and inexpensive test, which does not expose the patient

to radiation, and is reported to have sensitivity and spec-

ificity of 86 and 81% for the diagnosis of acute appendi-

citis, respectively.

7

The major disadvantage of USG is its

operator dependent character. There are also speculations

that the physiological and anatomical changes due to the

gravid uterus within the abdomen make the diagnosis of